oops... right... missed out on the per processor license part 😀

...and the CAL's for 2005, if not already in possession.....

I am not sure that was a setting, but a add-on/Mod we had for the SMF based forum.

It requires a little more effort, because they actually have to make a...

Mel Harbour (10/9/2009)

If it becomes a regular problem, we will look into restricting the ability to send other members emails/PMs until you have been established on the site for a...

Funny thing is that I received a message from that user.. well actually from favourkarume12@yahoo.com so one more to ban... maybe take it to teh next level..

That's correct when referring to VM's.... on VM's the licensing scheme is unique anyway....

Melton (10/8/2009)

Not really. You actually purchase a Server license and then,...

Thordog (10/8/2009)

---

I think the difference here is processor license compared to server license, which are two different things. The processor license lets you run as many instances of SQL...

Right... they get you with the "You have to acquire licenses only for processors that are accessible to any copy of the operating system upon which SQL Server 2005 is...

Animal Magic (10/6/2009)

---

Mark_Pratt (10/6/2009)

---

Melton (10/6/2009)

---

However, the caveat, if you bought a single processor license but your server has 2 processors in it, you are not in compliance with licensing. ...

... in other words... you need to look up your paper license and see what was purchased.

A nice FREE tool I use is WinDirStat[/url]

Looking at the table structure of both tables should give you the clue.

Someone must have added/removed a column.

Googling a bit around, found this.

Have you tried searching? You'd be amazed the results you can get...... That's all I did now.

Using the search box on your top right, I found these references to that topic.

Also found some reference here, but word .doc, but should be similar.