Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Some of the points below might lead to the answer :-
1. ISOLATION LEVEL of the query
2. if the Stored Proc is using many INSERT/UPDATES in it, it might worth looking...
🙂
June 15, 2005 at 7:01 am
If the records are unique, u might try using UNION ALL instead of UNION.
regds/ramanuj
🙂
June 15, 2005 at 6:52 am
If the Stored Proc was created sometimes back, it might be worth trying recompiling the Stored Proc. With that, it recreates the Execution Plan for the SP w.r.t current database...
🙂
June 15, 2005 at 6:48 am
Hi
1. With: tDocArchive.doa_batchorder%1 < 1 :: It uses "Nested Loops" JOIN whereas without ...%1 <1 it uses "Hash Match" JOIN. HASH JOIN uses more memory w.r.t. Nested LOOP JOIN. The execution...
🙂
June 15, 2005 at 6:42 am
Thanks Koby for your efforts to help me out of the problem. Your website provides information of OS Disk fragmentation in general.
I am looking for Fragmentation, internal allocation of data...
🙂
June 15, 2005 at 5:42 am
Thanks for all the information.
I have gone through Ken England's perf. Opt book as well.
I am also aware of DBCC PAGE, DBCC EXTENTINFO, etc DBCC commands, but I am still...
🙂
October 5, 2004 at 1:24 am
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)