Viewing 15 posts - 4,231 through 4,245 (of 7,636 total)
Right. You will notice by looking at the top of this page that this is a SQL Server 2005 forum.
December 24, 2008 at 10:42 am
The irony of course is that Report Generators are supposed to isolate the end-user from technical issues like this so that they do not have to know about them. ...
December 24, 2008 at 10:24 am
Exactly right, Tony. Using statistics like these as diagnostic metrics or even as change indicators is fine within the context of knowing what is normal and/or expected. But...
December 24, 2008 at 10:11 am
Overall, I think that I would have to agree that Bitwise aggregates really would be a useful extension to SQL Server, especially if the bitwise operations would fully support binary...
December 24, 2008 at 9:58 am
Just out of curiosity, I tested both of these methods across a million rows:
--====== Stats Off
SET STATISTICS TIME Off
SET STATISTICS IO Off
GO
DROP TABLE #SomeTable
GO
--===== Create the test data
...
December 24, 2008 at 9:53 am
OK, here is the Set-Based solution, using Jeff's data setup (I also stole Jeff's other two tricks for compactness):
--===== Create the test data
-- (NOT PART...
December 24, 2008 at 9:13 am
JohnG (12/24/2008)
December 24, 2008 at 8:51 am
Yes, like Seth, I suspect the transmission time. It's either your network or your Client that is too slow for that much data, not your SQL Server.
This highlights a...
December 24, 2008 at 8:41 am
It would be interesting to hear Microsoft's take on this error message though. I have some theories as to how Serializable Isolation + Logon Triggers could lead to this...
December 24, 2008 at 8:26 am
kendal.vandyke (12/23/2008)
I'm looking for technical reasons why a single data file on RAID 10 is better than two data files on two RAID 1's.
Ah, I see, I misunderstood the...
December 24, 2008 at 8:19 am
samsqlserver (12/22/2008)
If i am not wrong a trigger will fire either after...
December 24, 2008 at 8:08 am
SQLBOT (12/23/2008)
RBarryYoung (12/23/2008)
They were probably talking about query hints to force the use of a particular index.Hey How did you know...
Honestly? I felt a disturbance in the Force.
December 23, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Are we talking about UDF's or builtin functions? as far as I know, the only overhead that the builtin functions have is the CPU cost of their actual calculations.
December 23, 2008 at 8:01 pm
They were probably talking about query hints to force the use of a particular index.
December 23, 2008 at 7:42 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,231 through 4,245 (of 7,636 total)