Viewing 15 posts - 3,511 through 3,525 (of 7,636 total)
Great catch Alz! I forgot to check that... :blush:
February 28, 2009 at 7:22 am
I don't know of any feature of Queues that would do that for you. I think your best bet would be to write a proc to monitor it once...
February 27, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Actually, they're defenseless against Recursive Bows.
February 26, 2009 at 3:17 pm
OK, I'll have to try it tonight since I am at work and functional now.
February 26, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Yes too all three. However, I also have an Alias that forces the TCP protocol.
February 26, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Hmm, apparently, I am way too slow today... 😛
February 26, 2009 at 1:10 pm
That's a nice analysis, Gus. Though to be fair, I think that Jeff had already backed off a little. 🙂
February 26, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Yep, I think that andrewd covered for me just fine here... 🙂
February 26, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Grant Fritchey (2/26/2009)
RBarryYoung (2/25/2009)
Jeff Moden (2/25/2009)
February 26, 2009 at 6:48 am
Jeff Moden (2/25/2009)
February 25, 2009 at 9:44 pm
Jeff Moden (2/25/2009)
... or anyone who answers "Yes" to question #5 ... do you like pork chops? 😉
Love 'em! :w00t:
February 25, 2009 at 9:39 pm
I think that there is virtually no chance that we are going to agree on that standard, or that Steve would want to spend his time trying to enforce it.
February 25, 2009 at 8:02 am
I've read a lot of her work and she is definitely one of my favorite writers. 😛
February 25, 2009 at 6:21 am
Deoends on what the error is, where it was in the procedure and what was actually executing at the tinme of the error.
February 24, 2009 at 10:29 pm
Have you read the Connie Willis book? Now that's Sci-Fi/comedy worth reading! 🙂
February 24, 2009 at 9:40 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 3,511 through 3,525 (of 7,636 total)