Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Thank you very much! It seems the indexing of the table resolved the issue. However, we also added RETRY as an extra measure.
Thanks,
Pingala
September 30, 2016 at 5:22 am
Thanks. We implemented the RETRY to avoid deadlock. However, I am surprised how a queued DELETE got a deadlock in the first place if SQL Server does queued operations sequentially.
September 28, 2016 at 9:42 am
As the DELETEs are queued to SQL server, I thought it will take care of on executing synchronously
September 28, 2016 at 7:30 am
I am not sure how many rows are in a particular "queued" delete operation. Does indexing help?
September 28, 2016 at 6:19 am
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)