Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 938 total)

  • RE: Today''''s article - Career Paths for Programmers

    I didn't see the article, but for various reasons I think there will always be a need for technical people 'on shore'.  Just as an example, many businesses can't wait until it's...

  • RE: The Pitfall of "Not Equal To" Operator in Queries!

    "Actually comparisons of a NULL (or a non-NULL value) to a NULL results in UNKNOWN.  Your point is taken though:  The WHERE clause only returns results for rows...

  • RE: The Pitfall of "Not Equal To" Operator in Queries!

    "ANY COMPARISON OF A NON-NULL TO A NULL IS NULL"

    Actually comparisons of a NULL (or a non-NULL value) to a NULL results in UNKNOWN.  Your point is taken though: ...

  • RE: Free Encryption

    Hi Ed,

    No problem.  I also put the version in the DLL files so you can right click and look at the properties for the DLL's to check the version numbers.

    Thanks

  • RE: The Pitfall of "Not Equal To" Operator in Queries!

    Here's your sample tables with indexes on them.  Should eliminate the table scans in your query plan.

    CREATE TABLE Students (

    StID INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED,

    StName...

  • RE: The Joy of Numbers

    Be careful with that:

    SELECT @strReturn = COALESCE(@strReturn,'')+String+' '

    FROM dbo.fnSetSplitSV('The Quick Brown Fox Jumped Over the Slow Lazy Dog',' ')

    WHERE Row >= 8

    AFAIK, you can't rely on the...

  • RE: The Joy of Numbers

    Hi Simon,

    Thanks for the catch.  I don't know why I didn't test it with data with an empty first element in the list! (Doh!) Here's your solution converted over to take...

  • RE: The Joy of Numbers

    Celko definitely knows what he's doing and he writes good books.  I think people just get rubbed the wrong way by some of his responses on the newsgroups... but that's...

  • RE: The Joy of Numbers

    Thanks David.  If you're on SQL 2005 it's a simple matter of converting the function to a CTE and adding a ROW_NUMBER() to it.  I set it up that way...

  • RE: ANSI SQL Is Dead

    "Where's Steve?"

    Steve is "in the house".  He was kind enough to let me rant on today's editorial page

    As for you guys' comments, I...

  • RE: And Just like that

    Oh man!  First the Fat Boys break up, then Microsoft Bob goes away... and now this!!!  Arrrgghh!!!

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    Sometimes you can improve performance even more by using a properly indexed temp table to hold the intermediate results of the two queries instead of one large query with several...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    That's why I said "99.99999%" instead of 100%, in recognition that 0.00001% of the time you might find it necessary to pound your nails into the board with that hacksaw.

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    "All it is is a tool.  Those who categorically refuse to even consider using it are hopeless!!!  You can join the guy who thinks using temp tables is a mortal sin!"

    If 99.99999% of...

  • RE: Eliminating Cursors

    "So SQL Server has always had cursors because of its origins.  But set based queries are orders of magnitude more efficient.  I once re-wrote an entire order processing system originally...

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 938 total)