Viewing 15 posts - 6,076 through 6,090 (of 6,486 total)
The only page I get that tells me a date right now seems to imply that I'm running September 2007 locally.
Of course - when you run in "offline only"...
October 15, 2007 at 1:53 pm
What date modified? I was under the impression the only date tracked on a stored proc is the date it was created. That only gets updated when you...
October 15, 2007 at 1:29 pm
It depends on what is causing the "abort". If you mean - are there conditions where a long-running SQL task could stop others from running? Yes, if the "first"...
October 15, 2007 at 10:53 am
Try windows update (under optional downloads). It prompted me for an updated one the other day.
October 15, 2007 at 10:46 am
you have to take into account the number of "significant positions", meaning - the precision. The purpose of FLOAT is to store "approximate numbers", so some of the display...
October 15, 2007 at 10:10 am
..and that all leads to a question of definition. "Full week" vs partial, which weeks gets included in which year. That's all driven by what you are going...
October 15, 2007 at 9:51 am
Grant Fritchey (10/15/2007)
I'd hate to see the pile of excrement we'd be dealing with if we let unexamined, untested CLR into our db's.
...which of course, would be true if you...
October 15, 2007 at 9:43 am
Carl - my understanding is that it's some more complex version of one being multiplied by the other. so - both factors are "spread out throughout the NEWID()".
So -...
October 15, 2007 at 9:28 am
Sounds like you might be looking for a "pivot query" solution. Something like:
Select M.BookId, M.booktitle,
sum(case when d.status=1 then 1 else 0...
October 15, 2007 at 9:03 am
I'm sorry - perhaps it's too early on a Monday. What's the actual question?
October 15, 2007 at 8:42 am
Jeff Moden (10/15/2007)
The fastest option, though, would be to...
October 15, 2007 at 8:33 am
It's an interesting dynamic, because I've been in the scenario a few times. I've learned though that the majority of times - those who want to put you on...
October 15, 2007 at 8:24 am
The other way to do that is to use regular expressions, especially when you get into really ugly string matching/parsing. Setting up the regex methods are damn fast too...
October 15, 2007 at 7:49 am
for better or worse - I haven't received a PM - so the whole communication is right here.
October 12, 2007 at 12:33 pm
what did you put in to define the alias, field by field?
What settings do you have (field by field) in the TCPIP settings under
SQL Server 2005 Network Configuration Settings,...
October 11, 2007 at 2:46 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 6,076 through 6,090 (of 6,486 total)