Viewing 15 posts - 4,216 through 4,230 (of 6,105 total)
Can you post the T-SQL code behind the tables and specifically the foreign key constraints?
K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/shop/product.asp?ProductID=NI-SQL1
June 25, 2003 at 11:08 am
Have you been to this site?
http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/
K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/shop/product.asp?ProductID=NI-SQL1
June 25, 2003 at 11:07 am
I don't think any of us are saying developers can't be trusted. I've been a developer, a DBA, a system admin, and now I basically do all three plus architecture....
June 25, 2003 at 11:05 am
Not for that price, no. What company is this?
K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/shop/product.asp?ProductID=NI-SQL1
June 25, 2003 at 8:49 am
Don't wait on Yukon. It looks likely it's going to slip into 2004:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,557197,00.asp
K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/shop/product.asp?ProductID=NI-SQL1
June 25, 2003 at 7:19 am
Article where Microsoft's chief security strategist characterizes patch management as broke:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=10300045
K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/shop/product.asp?ProductID=NI-SQL1
June 25, 2003 at 7:12 am
quote:
it's shops like yours that didn't keep up w/patches that were the brunt of the problem....! (the slammer came out 6 months...
June 25, 2003 at 6:37 am
I would love to agree with you, but the fact of the matter is that patch management is still a major issue, even with tools like those provided by Microsoft,...
June 23, 2003 at 10:56 pm
quote:
this is where you dba-types are totally clueless - how is a developer going to develop when they can't create dts pkgs...
June 23, 2003 at 9:38 am
quote:
I think this is worth an article in its own right. When I did the MS courses for SQL6.5 it said that...
June 23, 2003 at 6:06 am
Once you have figured out the connection issue (see my response to your other post), the easiest way for you to initially do this is with DTS. If you can...
June 21, 2003 at 9:22 am
This is possibly because you're connecting (through the utility) using a SQL Server login and the SQL Server in question is set to Windows authentication (not Mixed Mode). You're not...
June 21, 2003 at 9:18 am
Right. Install the second instance just as you did the first. You'll need the name, the IP address, and the instance name. Read the article cited and you should be...
June 20, 2003 at 2:20 pm
It's really not very different from creating the initial instance. Make sure you have the name, the IP address, the disk (it'll have to be a separate set of shared...
June 20, 2003 at 1:07 pm
Steve Jones has several articles on how to do this:
TempDB:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/sjones/atemporarymove.asp
MSDB:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/sjones/movingmsdb.asp
Master:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/sjones/moveyourmaster.asp
K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/shop/product.asp?ProductID=NI-SQL1
June 20, 2003 at 7:04 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,216 through 4,230 (of 6,105 total)