Viewing 15 posts - 5,311 through 5,325 (of 7,187 total)
DV
Please will you post DDL and a sample of data for the CurrPeriod table.
Thanks
John
June 10, 2011 at 7:05 am
WITH NewOrders AS ( -- change prices here as required
SELECT 10 AS orderTotalPrice UNION ALL
SELECT 20 UNION ALL
SELECT 30 UNION ALL
SELECT 40
)
INSERT INTO [Order] (
orderId
,orderCustomerId
,orderTotalPrice
)
SELECT
NEWID()
,c.customerId
,n.orderTotalPrice
FROM
Customer c
CROSS JOIN
NewOrders n
-- Check...
June 10, 2011 at 6:59 am
OK, we're getting closer. Now will you please send some DDL that will actually create the tables when I run it on my SQL server.
Thanks
John
June 10, 2011 at 5:04 am
Table DDL, please, including foreign key constraint.
John
June 10, 2011 at 4:53 am
The same four orders for each customer? If not, what? Also, please provide table DDL in the form of CREATE TABLE statements.
John
June 10, 2011 at 4:48 am
DV
Just search for execute sql task parameter mapping - you should find loads of articles. Also, try searching for your original problem - somebody might already have solved it....
June 10, 2011 at 4:07 am
It should work with just a SELECT statement. How do you know the variable isn't being updated?
I would recommend that you use a stored procedure in any case, if...
June 10, 2011 at 3:33 am
Simon
Since Gail and I have taken the time to help you, and in case anyone else is reading this in the future with a similar problem, please will you post...
June 9, 2011 at 4:55 am
GilaMonster (6/9/2011)
Dynamic SQL.
Not so fast! Two alternatives here:
(1) Something like (simplified):
WHERE (@datatype = 'B' AND tablenameid IN (30,28))
OR (@datatype = 'C' AND tablenameid IN (11,48,132))
OR etc
(2) My preferred solution...
June 9, 2011 at 3:13 am
Triality (6/6/2011)
It's a data warehouse type environment where we load new data a couple of times per month.
If you only have changes to your database that often, then you don't...
June 9, 2011 at 1:39 am
You will need to do some string manipulation or some arithmetic on your date in order to get it into a format that can be converted. '20110607 11:11:11.111' is a...
June 8, 2011 at 8:48 am
Gus is right.
I think sp_delete_backuphistory is date specific, not database specific, so you may end up throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you use it.
John
June 7, 2011 at 7:01 am
First off, if your numbers are stored as characters, the first thing you need to do is CAST them as an integer data type, otherwise you may get unexpected results...
June 7, 2011 at 4:18 am
Krishna
The only thing I would say on this is that the collation you mention is for backwards compatibility. You should use Latin1_General_CI_AS instead. I'm afraid I haven't worked...
June 6, 2011 at 6:32 am
Lee Sloan (6/3/2011)
June 6, 2011 at 6:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 5,311 through 5,325 (of 7,187 total)