Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 411 total)
SQLRNNR (7/13/2011)
Gianluca Sartori (7/13/2011)
Here he goes again.I didn't notice it from the start.
Funny. 🙂
Added my two bits. :-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D
Jason - I think your answer was the most appropriate and answered...
July 13, 2011 at 12:34 pm
jcrawf02 (7/12/2011)
Jim Murphy (7/12/2011)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/12/2011)
Seems like the drive for profits interferes in many business' ability to deliver good service.
Yep. I find that the most service-friendly...
July 12, 2011 at 3:31 pm
SQLkiwi (7/12/2011)
The Dixie Flatline (7/12/2011)
Forget Denali and R2... It's almost time to start talking about (American) Football again.[font="Comic Sans MS"]Oh good.[/font]
Comic Sans MS is the official sarcasm font, I'm told.
[font="Comic...
July 12, 2011 at 3:27 pm
rfr.ferrari (7/12/2011)
Perry Whittle (7/12/2011)
RAID5 and RAID6 have the overhead of parity calculations. RAID10 write performance is much better.
overhead of writes on disks (on case swap disk too), but better performance...
July 12, 2011 at 11:36 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/12/2011)
Seems like the drive for profits interferes in many business' ability to deliver good service.
Yep. I find that the most service-friendly 'banks' are Credit...
July 12, 2011 at 12:15 am
Stefan Krzywicki (7/11/2011)
I don't know if none of the best banks are US based, but most of the worst banks are US based.
Do 'best banks' exist? Seems to me...
July 11, 2011 at 6:02 pm
Pei Zhu-415513 (7/11/2011)
Yes. Traditionally raid 5 needs at least 3 disks. But I clearly remembered our windows admin configure raid 5 with 2 disks when he installed the brand new...
July 11, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Pei Zhu-415513 (7/11/2011)
... raid 5 with 2 disks does not make any sense
R5 with 2 disks is impossible. A minimum of 3 disks are required for RAID 5.
R10 may...
July 11, 2011 at 11:49 am
Pei Zhu-415513 (7/11/2011)
Say raid 10 like below
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
you can have
0 0 1 1
0 1 1 1
(0 indicates failure drive)
That was what I meant 'in worst...
July 11, 2011 at 10:55 am
Pei Zhu-415513 (7/11/2011)
Your comments are not true. For raid 10, in worst scenario you can affrod having 3 disks failure (two mirrorred disks + 1) since raid 10 is mirrorred...
July 11, 2011 at 9:50 am
SQLkiwi (7/10/2011)
Yes I meant 1TB, and don't call me Shirley 🙂
HA! Funny.
Also - Original Poster: drives which are that big sound like they are SATA drives. If you...
July 10, 2011 at 6:48 am
8 drives is not a lot. Plus, performance depends on how your data will be accessed (heavier writes, reads or a split). Course, it's always a split, but...
July 9, 2011 at 2:47 pm
If the database is in Full Recovery Model, you can do a single log backup and point in time restore from that. However, if you are using Simple, then...
July 7, 2011 at 5:20 pm
GilaMonster (7/7/2011)
Jim Murphy (7/7/2011)
July 7, 2011 at 4:58 pm
GilaMonster (7/7/2011)
Jack Corbett (7/7/2011)
July 7, 2011 at 4:28 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 411 total)