Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 72 total)
Didn't we have this same question three days ago?
Good to see so many people got it right though - at least we're learning! 😉
-----
JL
February 17, 2005 at 2:09 am
Rich, you'll see if you run the given query that it actually works fine. No error is returned.
-----
JL
January 27, 2005 at 2:18 am
Hi Andy,
What's the latest on this contest? Are we any nearer to finding a winner?
I am very interested to see some of the other solutions to this problem.
James
-----
JL
October 11, 2004 at 2:43 am
What happened to the answer for "none of the above"? There is no such thing as a Server object - only a SQLServer object ![]()
-----
JL
October 7, 2004 at 3:02 am
From SQL 2000 BOL:
SQL Server must be able to resolve unambiguously the modification operation to specific rows in one of the base tables referenced by the view. You cannot use...
-----
JL
August 31, 2004 at 4:40 am
You cannot do this as the update references two tables
In the update statement, you are trying to update a column from more than one table (ie CustomerName from...
-----
JL
August 31, 2004 at 2:31 am
As much as I'd love for this fascinating thread to continue...
fhanlon, I can't help but notice you've worked your way into a corner here. Check your last post and the definition of...
-----
JL
August 27, 2004 at 2:44 am
Initially, I too thought the lack of comma may have been a "trick" in the question - but then I tried it out and realised that it didn't matter.
I would...
-----
JL
July 29, 2004 at 5:06 am
Also:
- can we assume that scores are entered in sequence, ie the RowID can be used to get the order that balls were thrown?
- will the table hold the scores...
-----
JL
July 22, 2004 at 5:49 am
This isn't really the right forum for this question but...
SELECT DB_NAME()
-----
JL
June 9, 2004 at 9:29 am
John, you can see the full questions on the QOD home page:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/testcenter/qod.asp
-----
JL
June 4, 2004 at 7:59 am
On first glance it seems that this is a very ambiguous question. However, you could argue that the DATEPART function would return different, possibly confusing, results depending on any SET DATEFIRST statements that...
-----
JL
June 4, 2004 at 2:22 am
Clarification, from BOL:
SUSER_NAME always returns NULL when used in Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000. This system built-in function is included only for backward compatibility. Use SUSER_SNAME instead.
-----
JL
May 21, 2004 at 2:27 am
The fact that it is marked as a user table in sysobjects does not change the fact that the dtproperties table is actually a system table. If I indicate my...
-----
JL
May 12, 2004 at 7:14 am
I would like to take issue with this question. The script as written will attempt to update permissions for the dtproperties system table (this table contains information about database diagrams) as...
-----
JL
May 12, 2004 at 3:57 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 72 total)