Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 3,348 total)
I think I know what you are after. But to prevent me guessing and you possibly using a solution that works fine on your test data only, I will not...
January 28, 2016 at 2:05 pm
tonytohme (1/28/2016)
Hugo,Many thanks, that was the only query that worked for me 🙂 Awesome!!!
Thanks a lot
Good! Now test it with a much larger and more varied selection of test data....
January 28, 2016 at 1:52 pm
Perhaps a stupid question, but did you actually copy over the job to the new server? And did you make sure that the name is unchanged?
If you answer yes to...
January 28, 2016 at 12:29 pm
Since you say that you only want data from table t1 if it satisfies the condition that it has "English" in table2, I would keep the query close to these...
January 28, 2016 at 12:27 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (1/28/2016)
The value is ambigious, as Hugo noted
Not ambiguous. Missing.
Pedantic, I know, but there are situations where the distinction is relevant.
January 28, 2016 at 8:46 am
g.britton (1/28/2016)
Carlo Romagnano (1/28/2016)
However NULLs are not restricted as the value could be less than 10
CHECK evaluates only true (accepted) or false (rejected) expression not UNKNOWN (accepted).
From...
January 28, 2016 at 7:45 am
At this time there is no built-in functionality in SQL Server for transforming a number into words.
January 27, 2016 at 3:15 pm
For SQL Server, integrity and consistency are like holy grails.
So even if you use different filegroups, SQL Server will still insist that they be consistent. When restoring you can do...
January 27, 2016 at 3:13 pm
Ray K (1/27/2016)
Ed Wagner (1/27/2016)
DonlSimpson (1/27/2016)
Ed Wagner (1/27/2016)
BL0B_EATER (1/27/2016)
Ed Wagner (1/27/2016)
Grumpy DBA (1/27/2016)
Ed Wagner (1/27/2016)
DisneyMoney
Lots
Many
People
Places
Memories
RAM
Battering
January 27, 2016 at 10:04 am
Disclaimer first: I have never used Oracle. So take the below with a huge helping of salt, please.
However, I have heard many times that Oracle, unlike SQL Server, does not...
January 27, 2016 at 8:45 am
Several people have already explained how SQL Server treats memory, so I won't repeat that.
But I am going to question your question. You want to reduce the memory used by...
January 27, 2016 at 8:36 am
First hit on Google: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/amantaras/archive/2014/10/21/biztalk-server-is-not-supported-with-sql-always-on.aspx
January 27, 2016 at 8:30 am
That's the CREATE TABLE statements I was asking for, but not the INSERT statements, nor the expected results.
Also, the queries in your original question reference two table variables; one is...
January 27, 2016 at 8:29 am
I see myself as mostly database developer, not a DBA. So I have not done a lot of upgrades. For a serious production use, I would definitely insist that the...
January 27, 2016 at 6:50 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 3,348 total)