Viewing 15 posts - 3,226 through 3,240 (of 3,348 total)
Lynn Pettis (3/7/2008)
March 7, 2008 at 7:26 am
Lynn Pettis (3/7/2008)
So, based on all the comments so far, does everyone agree we all should get our 2 points?Perhaps a poll should be setup.
😎
I'd rather say that noone who...
March 7, 2008 at 6:52 am
Colin Davidson (3/7/2008)
March 7, 2008 at 2:51 am
I did not answer today's question since none of the answers is correct.
First, none of the answers returns a tinyint. One returns decimal(9,2), the others return int
Second, they all produce...
March 6, 2008 at 10:59 am
skra (2/22/2008)
1.There are a lot of artricles on the SQL Server Central website about undocumented features of the SQL Server and which were found by readers quite useful.
True. And I...
February 22, 2008 at 3:02 am
The actual problem is that a view is conceptuallly equal to a table - that is, it has no implied sort order. The only way to be sure to get...
February 22, 2008 at 1:47 am
Hi Steve,
I see that you have beaten me to the punch. That's the down side of having something else as your day job 🙂
Anyway, I still have decided to blog...
February 1, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Hi Chad,
I'll just chime in here and say that I like the question very much. The only thing that could have imoproved it was if there had been an explicit...
January 31, 2008 at 12:14 pm
Dr. Diana Dee (1/31/2008)
I'd appreciate the location and exact quote.
Hi D,
The relevant quote on the referenced page is: "It may be applied anywhere a table or table expression is used...
January 31, 2008 at 1:19 am
As an FYI, allow me to add that, even though the question speicfically mentions SQL Server 2000, the maximum size for context session information is actually the same in SQL...
January 17, 2008 at 4:51 am
Steve Jones - Editor (1/16/2008)
Points awarded back and...
January 16, 2008 at 11:46 am
A bit more thought should have gone in this question (and the answers) before posting them.
The documentation says that this feature "Requires the 64-bit edition of Windows Server 2008 Datacenter...
January 16, 2008 at 12:54 am
Hi Jeff,
Well, that really depends on how you define "it works" for sp_depends.
The most simple explanation I can give for sp_depends in that it basically has the same effect as...
January 9, 2008 at 10:55 am
Hi Jeff,
The schema change in the discussion so far was actually meant to relate to a change in the schema (i.e. design) of the table, not to a change in...
January 9, 2008 at 9:29 am
Jeff Deluca (1/9/2008)
What did I miss?
Hi Jeff,
I don't know what you did to try this. The code below works for me. Can you post the code you used to test...
January 9, 2008 at 8:28 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,226 through 3,240 (of 3,348 total)