Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    Tom,

    Thanks for taking the time to elaborate on this approach. I could not infer from previous posts that what you described in detail was suggested.

    This does seem like the most...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    ChrisM@Work (4/26/2013)

    Those are 'organisations'...

    Well, not quite. There could be multiple regional offices for "Organizations", with each one having their own unique set of phone numbers. Again, for the purposes of...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    ChrisM@Work (4/26/2013)[/b

    Look at the work you will have to do when you want to bring each of those phone numbers into line with a parent row:

    SELECT p.*,

    [mobile 1]= f1.PhoneNum,

    [mobile...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    patrickmcginnis59 10839 (4/26/2013)

    This is an interesting case, so I'm guessing that it really depends on how important the functionality of the foreign key constraint is for your needed functionality. If...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    Although I agree in principle that most common scenario regarding phone numbers is that there is one per person, in the system that I am designing that is just not...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    Sean Lange (4/25/2013)

    Personally I think this over complicates this greatly. The number of rows sharing the same phone number is likely going to be relatively small. There will be a...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    ChrisM@Work (4/25/2013)


    This doesn't really address the point I raised. If phone number is an attribute of [Person] or [Staff] or whatever, what would you gain by abstracting phone number into...

  • RE: Complex many to many relationships

    Well, first they are not many to many then, and second it constrains the software development due to the inability for code reuse.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)