Viewing 15 posts - 14,716 through 14,730 (of 14,953 total)
Nope. Gotta have that in there.
Of course, it's actually a best-practice to qualify all your objects that way. Makes your database run slightly faster.
February 7, 2008 at 12:12 pm
It sounds to me like you're on the right path.
I got into databases from a background in sales and marketing, and an education in management and executive function. (It's...
February 7, 2008 at 11:52 am
The company I currently work for had a similar situation till I got here.
There was actually no admin on the databases other than automatically scheduled backups. No re-indexing, no/very...
February 7, 2008 at 11:31 am
I tend to suspect that the reason for the difference in results is that getdate() includes the time of day, while the dates you manually typed in were both midnight.
If,...
February 7, 2008 at 8:54 am
I get the same results as Matt.
Also tried it without the Order By, and it still kept the result you're looking for in the 4th row.
February 7, 2008 at 8:47 am
Never mind. Managed to get a hold of a copy of Enterprise Manager. Good to go!
February 7, 2008 at 8:08 am
Also on Tony's function, unless you're planning on going over 2-billion (American billion), don't use BigInt. Int is good up to 2,147,483,647 per BOL. Making it BigInt just...
February 7, 2008 at 7:15 am
Matt Miller (2/7/2008)
Jim Russell (2/7/2008)
Tell...
February 7, 2008 at 7:08 am
I think my response would be in terms of "I'm pretty sure that XML wasn't a data type in SQL 2000" (or whatever was being asserted). Then, hopefully, the...
February 7, 2008 at 6:57 am
If you use the string parser function from Adam's post (I seem to recognize it from somewhere), and use the Cross Apply capabilities of SQL 2005, you can do the...
February 6, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Yes, Reporting Services could do this, with a cross-tab report.
February 6, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 14,716 through 14,730 (of 14,953 total)