Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 5,685 total)
SQLSeTTeR (11/8/2012)
That is what I'm looking for. Not thinking. Thank you very much.
Heheh, I've had those days. 😀 Glad I could help.
November 8, 2012 at 5:30 pm
SQLSeTTeR (11/8/2012)
November 8, 2012 at 5:13 pm
An alternative, which will allow you to more easily see how you're connecting up the different node connections, is as follows.
I've left a note in the code, but the big...
November 8, 2012 at 5:10 pm
GilaMonster (11/8/2012)
Yes, the cluster plus uniquifier is in the NC index. The uniquifier does not change upon rebuild, hence the NC indexes don't need updating. It did and...
November 8, 2012 at 3:37 pm
From the same MSDN article:
Rebuilding an index drops the index and creates a new one. In doing this, fragmentation is removed, disk space is reclaimed by compacting the pages using...
November 8, 2012 at 3:12 pm
Rebuilding a clustered index is basically a drop/create and resets the internal additional RIDs for the index rows on the clustered, forcing all non-clustered indexes to be updated so they...
November 8, 2012 at 2:48 pm
AndrewSQLDBA (11/8/2012)
I just saw some of the data as only 3 digits. So 499 would need to be converted to 499.00 etc.....
This particular component is going to take this...
November 8, 2012 at 1:53 pm
Short form: What you're looking for is to adjust your query with what's called an OUTER JOIN, in this case most likely a LEFT Join.
Basically, your select query should base...
November 8, 2012 at 1:50 pm
What you're seeing is most likely the primary key, which is both.
The Primary Key is a specific type of index that is also a constraint, and is created as such...
November 6, 2012 at 2:49 pm
It's annoying but doable. Annoying at the levels of if Jeff has a way to easily attach it via BCP do that.
However, the answer, in shorthand.
First, create a second...
November 2, 2012 at 6:28 pm
If you take a look in my signature for the link regarding indexes/tuning, we can help you further.
The like is SARGable, no big deal. As is the date. ...
November 2, 2012 at 5:48 pm
Paul,
In a case like this I would look towards chaining fact tables. I don't know the proper term, I'm not a warehouse expert, I just build 'em.
What it would...
November 2, 2012 at 4:32 pm
Matt,
What kind of value tests are you looking to do against the rows? As mentioned above, you can do things with lookup tests and the like to test for...
November 2, 2012 at 4:12 pm
The - symbol usually denotes a negative value, so that's probably right. Hard to tell with the limited information.
What in particular is the concern? You want it to...
November 2, 2012 at 2:57 pm
Um, errr, hrm.
You do realize we can't see your tables, your usage history, or your heuristics to make that kind of broad recommendation in either direction, correct?
Including columns in an...
November 2, 2012 at 2:55 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 5,685 total)