Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
I realize that a full checkDB is better. However, this server has 10TB of data on it and a full checkDB would simply take too long. Also, this...
November 2, 2010 at 9:21 am
#1245485
To be clean I am running DBCC CHECKDB ('database name', noindex) WITH PHYSICAL ONLY.
This is actually a Microsoft recommendation, refer to Books Online, DBCC CHECKDB, Best Practice. No matter...
November 1, 2010 at 4:49 pm
#1245133