Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,253 total)
Thanks.
In a perfect world should'nt the compatibility level also change?
March 2, 2009 at 4:10 am
or stored procs if u r using them. You have better error handling in stored procs.
March 2, 2009 at 2:19 am
Nice article.
After a doing side by side upgrade the databases are moved to the new instance by dettach/attach or backup/restore. Will this change the compatibility level of the database being...
March 2, 2009 at 12:21 am
Yes thats right.
Better the design lesser the headaches later on.
March 1, 2009 at 11:06 pm
Its a general question that you have asked. There are pros and cons for both.Whats the prupose you are trying to achieve?
February 27, 2009 at 3:42 am
Pls keep us updated on this.
February 27, 2009 at 1:39 am
Thanks a lot everyone. 🙂
Going back to the example i mentioned intially if the log backup size is 2 mb then the amount of data being modified is LESS THAN...
February 27, 2009 at 1:35 am
Wont the redgate tool internally using a ETL process?
Using the tool would make it easy for the end user to accomplish the task.
February 26, 2009 at 3:40 am
Try this in your test environment.
UPDATE D
SET seqCol = RowId
FROM
(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY FK_ID ORDER BY CreationDate) AS RowId
...
February 25, 2009 at 10:53 pm
Is the issue solved.
February 25, 2009 at 10:31 pm
How about writing the query using UNION .
February 25, 2009 at 10:24 pm
Jeff Moden (2/25/2009)
February 25, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Iam using RTM version and in that there no need for ".BAK".
Not sure about SP2.
February 25, 2009 at 9:50 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,253 total)