Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
That's an excellent point, and we're doing that. The initial compilation of each version of the query isn't a particular overhead, and it gives us the flexibility, as you say,...
October 4, 2010 at 9:30 pm
Definitely haven't tried this option, will test when I get into the office later, and post back then! Thanks.
Actually, we're pushing back on the whole requirement to search for what...
October 4, 2010 at 9:21 pm
Thanks. I'll repost the query, plus the resources to support it, but need to depersonalise the information beforehand. I agree with your point on MERGE, and usually avoid query hints,...
October 4, 2010 at 3:43 am
Oh, two additional pieces of information.
1. The query needs to run in milliseconds. Without the LEFT OUTER JOIN within X it does. With the JOIN, the results (obviously dependent...
October 4, 2010 at 3:27 am
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)