Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 135 total)
Thank you all for the help.
I think this explains some of the issues I'm seeing. I can work with this information.
September 7, 2016 at 8:42 am
The compatibility level is 120. I've never run into a server not defaulting to dbo. I think that's where i'm finding my confusion.
September 6, 2016 at 3:35 pm
Every user defaulting to [domain/user].tablename is standard behavior?
September 6, 2016 at 2:37 pm
There is no job that handles the monthly partitioning currently. I'm planning on working on that after I sort the partitions out.
January 15, 2016 at 7:14 am
Bill (DBAOnTheGo) (4/16/2014)
Personally I'd like to make sure this is out there. Francis Apel, we do appreciate the article and you writing here. Not everyone will agree and in honesty...
April 16, 2014 at 10:05 am
Personally I'd like to make sure this is out there. Francis Apel, we do appreciate the article and you writing here. Not everyone will agree and in honesty it created...
April 16, 2014 at 5:50 am
Sure, in the land of unlimited budgets. Which is vastly outnumbered by those who have no choice but to patch directly in production.
to be fair, clustering everything is a bit...
April 16, 2014 at 5:46 am
Anyone else notice the irony? Hehe I hope Francis' organization has a failover for when the DBA goes down.Smile
Smile
Now that's funny.
April 15, 2014 at 9:33 pm
I do like mirroring... I'm sure that's apparent. ^.^
Every form of replication has it's place and before any replication is used... you need to ask yourselves a good set...
April 15, 2014 at 7:40 pm
I have a feeling Allan feels a little bit better now.
Seriously though. There's a lot of good information there. We appreciate it. we had a 6 node multi-instance cluster...
April 15, 2014 at 3:36 pm
Active/active is improper terminology.
+1
April 15, 2014 at 3:10 pm
My expertise level in SQL is somewhere below the "DBA in diapers" (I couldn't think of a cool phrase to express my ineptness), but if the clustered servers all share...
April 15, 2014 at 2:58 pm
Don't want to get off topic, but we have our SQL running on a VM and would like to have another running SQL ready to go in case of emergency....
April 15, 2014 at 12:16 pm
We actually did just that. We mirrored over, failed over and just did a DNS Alias. It's faster and effective. The only reason I didn't mention it prior is that...
April 15, 2014 at 9:42 am
On the KISS thing. I do agree. Clustering has some pretty heavy negatives for it. You have to be on a domain, you have to have share storage, you now...
April 15, 2014 at 8:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 135 total)