Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 193 total)
GilaMonster (11/26/2009)
Andrew Gothard-467944 (11/26/2009)
November 27, 2009 at 4:16 am
How about putting Profiler on the target server to see if you can pin down more precisely where it's breaking?
November 26, 2009 at 8:42 am
Aw. Sorry if I sent you off on a wild goose chase mate.
November 26, 2009 at 7:50 am
Use for performance testing on dev servers, checkpoint the db before running. Don't run against live.
What it does is clear down your procedure cache - if you...
November 26, 2009 at 4:08 am
Might it be because you have - on both databases - an autogenerated UNIQUEIDENTIFIER column, so the log shipping is attempting to update a column with a specific value (from...
November 26, 2009 at 2:21 am
http://www.vogon-international.com/
Not cheap - but if the data is valuable (and why would you have it otherwise)
November 23, 2009 at 9:54 am
I have a feeling that this may well be more a Business Process/Functional Analysis issue - rather than something to be addressed from the DB side.
Don't know about anyone else,...
November 18, 2009 at 3:20 am
Paul White (11/10/2009)
One might even persist the first few characters of the unencrypted value and index that. It all depends on the...
November 11, 2009 at 6:00 am
Paul White (11/11/2009)
CREATE VIEW dbo.CrystalBallsWITH SCHEMABINDING
AS SELECT Egg FROM
(
VALUES
('Egg'), ('Egg'), ('Egg'), ('Egg'),
...
November 11, 2009 at 2:23 am
ORM - Obscene Relation Mangling?
November 10, 2009 at 8:23 am
Rather than denormalise (assuming the db is correctly normalised in the first place) and potentially throwing the baby out with the bathwater, if you have complex reporting needs you would...
November 8, 2009 at 7:20 am
In addition to the advice from Eliott W and robert.mcleod, I would also recommend that you have a QA version of the database that mirrors live. First test all...
November 8, 2009 at 6:59 am
If stopped, dbcc reindex will rollback - ie it will use the t logs to undo all the work carried out to that point, meaning your index will still be...
October 30, 2009 at 3:21 am
For the delete, I'd put the process in a loop deleting, say, 4500 rows at a time until your target removal records are all gone.
The reason for this...
October 29, 2009 at 4:40 am
dmoldovan (10/26/2009)
I agree with Paul. My husband is currently working with ERP LN (former BAAN) and the column names are "horror"...:-)
Ah, good old ttdssls045123.t_dqua etc, etc.
How I don't miss the...
October 26, 2009 at 6:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 193 total)