Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 145 total)
Thanks Paul, I'll give it a try and test it out.
May 12, 2010 at 10:02 pm
Paul,
I always had this question in mind, isn't there a performance penalty in using this approach on the DB side. Imagine if there are several thousand records, SQL Server still...
May 12, 2010 at 11:07 am
And with SQL Server 2008 it is even better. It's getting there, just have to wait a little more i think before it is claimed as the best ever ETL...
May 11, 2010 at 3:26 pm
Brilliant article and the timing is so right. I have had code being sent by App Developer today to develop a paged recordset using stored procedures. Just began to work...
May 11, 2010 at 1:42 pm
It's doing all Clustered index seek. Tried all possible optimization. Also tried replacing the @table variable to a #temp table..didn't help.
My question is there a way to tell SSIS to...
May 6, 2010 at 12:44 pm
The time to run the SP definitely is longer than it should have taken, almost double the time (~6 minutes).
Thanks,
May 6, 2010 at 11:53 am
Tried both, thru BIDS and Job, same results.
May 6, 2010 at 11:43 am
Is there an option to turn off pre-validation? How to do that?
Thanks,
May 6, 2010 at 11:30 am
Yes, i tuned the proc execution down to 3 minutes from 20 minutes, yet the package takes longer to execute.
May 6, 2010 at 11:09 am
How about this then... Load all the records to a staging table with IDENTITY column. Using T-SQL Loop thru the records using IDENTITY range. This will be more efficient and...
April 28, 2010 at 10:28 pm
But why do you need to use a For each loop? As mentioned by stewartc mentioned use batch size and commit size of 10,000 with TABLOCK option in the OLEDB...
April 28, 2010 at 10:36 am
Very intelligent question. I got this wrong though :(. The second part of the question tricked me into thinking that the SQL Server will have an efficient way to retrieve...
April 20, 2010 at 10:55 am
Agreed da-zero. But table variables are meant to hold smaller datasets and having an index doesn't really benefit here and as regards truncation of the table variable, it's not required...
April 14, 2010 at 10:36 am
Thanks for the response Lynn. I agree with you, i am aware of partitioning although i wanted to see if i could effectively use partitioned views in this scenario.
I guess...
January 15, 2010 at 12:56 pm
The table is a name-value pair table has only 3 columns:
[ID] -- NOT an identity, but a FK to another table in the db.
[Name]
[Value]
Primary key is [Object_ID] and [Name].
We are...
January 15, 2010 at 12:43 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 145 total)