Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 692 total)
Getanothername, wouldn't you expect error checking to be handled by constraints rather than the query to select the data?
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
July 22, 2004 at 1:36 pm
What should the output look like if the last frame bowled was a strike and it wasn't the 10th frame? A NULL, maybe?
Frame 5 ...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
July 22, 2004 at 12:32 pm
Number one reason not to use the debugger is that, simply put, it sucks!
A) You have to type in all of the parameters. This can be extremely time-consuming if you...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
July 9, 2004 at 11:37 am
Linda,
You can try sp_attach_single_file_db, which once again MIGHT work, IF conditions were correct at shutdown... But the only way to guarantee that attach will work is to detach the database...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
April 13, 2004 at 8:12 am
The "correct" answer to this is a *BIG* maybe. IF the transactional state of the database happened to be clean when it went down, then this might work; otherwise, you...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
April 13, 2004 at 7:31 am
I think DanaH1976 had the right idea; assuming your company's structures stay static and they don't re-shuffle management/groups on a very regular basis, that solution will provide you with the...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 24, 2004 at 8:32 am
Best question in days (or perhaps weeks). Even if the answer was slightly wrong ![]()
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 24, 2004 at 7:47 am
There's nothing inherently wrong with using surrogate keys. Even most so-called "purists" have no problem with it as long as uniqueness and integrity is enforced using constraints and the surrogate...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 20, 2004 at 12:04 pm
Nothing wrong with using EM for backup/restore! It's a lot quicker, unless you've done the work up front of creating QA templates for all of the common manual backup/restore operations (which,...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 16, 2004 at 11:38 am
Very badly worded question ... "making sure you use ..." What does that mean? Use for what? How about "making sure you DON'T use (the same filename)"?
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 16, 2004 at 7:40 am
Thor:
DataDynamics ActiveReports can. I've used it quite extensively and IMO it's a pretty solid product. Better automation capabilities than CR and very cheap too. I haven't tried MS Reporting Services yet though,...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 12, 2004 at 11:03 am
Serialization, IMO, defeats the purpose of having a DBMS and brings us back to flat-file land. Part of the definition of a DBMS is that it's shared - many processes can...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 12, 2004 at 10:07 am
Tatsu:
Are you talking about using a queing system to serialize database access?
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 12, 2004 at 9:27 am
Thor:
There is a fine line between "business rules" (e.g. constraints) and "business logic" (e.g. if user enters something in this field, pop up this message)... It really needs to be...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 12, 2004 at 9:24 am
An article by C.J. Date on data models, what is a data model, and (more importantly?) what's not:
http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/622923.htm
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
February 12, 2004 at 7:51 am
Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 692 total)