October 31, 2013 at 4:50 am
According to Brent Ozar's blog (in the comments) it's 64GB per instance. But you should read his reply to that comment.
http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/06/sql-server-r-standard-supports-less-memory/%5B/url%5D
EDIT: You should also consider what will happen to the OS if you're using 2 instances that gobble up the rest of the server's RAM.
October 31, 2013 at 4:58 am
Thanks for the response Brandie - The named instance is to be used as a warm standby for DR, so there is no real performance concerns as the default instance will be switched off if required
SQL DBA
Every day is a school day, and don't trust anyone who tells you any different.
http://sqlblogness.blogspot.co.uk
October 31, 2013 at 5:01 am
I don't advise using the same server for a warm standby of your primary database. If you lose the server, you lose both the primary and the stand by.
October 31, 2013 at 7:29 am
The DR is not for the same server - It's a warm standby of another server but always worth mentioning for others reading the post. It wouldn't really meet the DR requireements if it was on the same one.
Thanks
SQL DBA
Every day is a school day, and don't trust anyone who tells you any different.
http://sqlblogness.blogspot.co.uk
October 31, 2013 at 7:53 am
In that case, I'd make sure you have enough RAM for both instances to be up (when the other server fails) and still be able to run the OS, etc. RAM is cheap and CYA is good.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply