SQL - How to compare data of a column while iterating row by row and insert new

  • I have the below data in an SQL Server(2017) table

    POS_ID   Term Code         Status           IsActive
    TR 101 In Progress true
    TR 102 In Progress true
    TR 103 In Progress true
    CA 151 In Progress true
    CA 152 In Progress true
    DA 161 In Progress true

    The requirement is I want to iterate each row and compare the current row POS_ID with the previous row and if there is a different POS_ID found then I want to insert 2 rows in between in such a way that the 1st inserted row's status for that previous POS_ID will be In Progress and true and 2nd inserted row's status will be discontinued and false and term code of both these 2 inserted rows will be Term code of new POS_ID of current row Something like below example,

    Expected output

    POS_ID      Term Code          Status           IsActive
    TR 101 In Progress true
    TR 102 In Progress true
    TR 103 In Progress true
    TR 151 In Progress true -- NEW ROW
    TR 151 discontinue false -- NEW ROW
    CA 151 In Progress true
    CA 152 In Progress true
    CA 161 In Progress true -- NEW ROW
    CA 161 discontinue false -- NEW ROW
    DA 161 In Progress true

    I have tried using the Lead function to check the next value in the row for the column, but not sure how to do implement logic as mentioned above if values don't match insert 2 new rows

    SELECT POS_ID AS currentvalue,
    LEAD(POS_ID) OVER (ORDER BY uniqueid) AS NextValue
    FROM dbo.input_Main_data

    Create table and Insert script

    Create table dbo.input_Main_data
    ( UniqueId bigint identity(1,1),
    POS_ID varchar(10),
    Term_code bigint,
    Status varchar(50),
    IsActive bit,
    CONSTRAINT PK_input_Main_data_UniqueId PRIMARY KEY (UniqueId)
    )
    GO

    INSERT INTO dbo.input_Main_data([POS_ID],[Term_code], [Status], [IsActive]) Values ('TR',101,'IN_PROGRESS',1), ('TR',102,'IN_PROGRESS',1), ('TR',103,'IN_PROGRESS',1),('CA',151,'IN_PROGRESS',1),('CA',152,'IN_PROGRESS',1),('DA',161,'IN_PROGRESS',1)

     

    • This topic was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by  vikasjagadale8. Reason: updated code
    • This topic was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by  vikasjagadale8.
    • This topic was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by  vikasjagadale8.
  • Can you please provide sample DDL and INSERT scripts to create your sample data?

    Can you also describe exactly how the dataset should be ordered?

    If you haven't even tried to resolve your issue, please don't expect the hard-working volunteers here to waste their time providing links to answers which you could easily have found yourself.

  • Hello @Phil Parkin I have updated my post with Query to create a table with sample data.

    And I have already posted expected output

  •  

    /*INSERT INTO dbo.input_Main_data ( ... )*/
    SELECT new_rows.*
    FROM dbo.input_Main_data iMd1
    CROSS APPLY (
    SELECT TOP (1) *
    FROM dbo.input_Main_data iMd2
    WHERE iMd2.Term_code > iMd1.Term_code
    ORDER BY Term_code
    ) AS iMd2
    CROSS APPLY (
    SELECT iMd1.POS_ID, iMd2.Term_code, 'IN_PROGRESS' AS Status, 1 AS IsActive /*, ...*/
    UNION ALL
    SELECT iMd1.POS_ID, iMd2.Term_code, 'DISCONTINUE', 0 /*, ...*/
    ) AS new_rows
    WHERE iMd2.POS_ID <> iMd1.POS_ID

    SQL DBA,SQL Server MVP(07, 08, 09) A socialist is someone who will give you the shirt off *someone else's* back.

  • My answer was posted on Stack Overflow.  It assumes as little as possible about your data.  The final result isn't in the same order as the example output because there doesn't appear to be an ORDER BY clause which re-produces it.  But the INSERT statement should be good.

    Aus dem Paradies, das Cantor uns geschaffen, soll uns niemand vertreiben können

  • >> I have the below data in a SQL Server 2017 table: <<

    First of all, failure to post DDL is just plain rude as well as a mess. For those of us who now have to do your job for you. You also don't seem to know what a key is in RDBMS; it is a subset of columns that uniquely define each row. Since rows have no position or ordering, the concept of the current row and previous row are useless. What are we ordering these rows by?

    There is no such thing as a generic "status" in RDBMS; it has to be the status of something. And since we don't even know the name of the table so hard to get exactly what it is. The use of bit flags is assembly language and has nothing to do with RDBMS. We are a predicate oriented language and you discover the status with predicates, not with assembly language flags.

    CREATE TABLE Foobar

    (pos_id CHAR(2) NOT NULL,

    term_code CHAR(3) NOT NULL,

    foo_status VARCHAR(12) NOT NULL

    CHECK (foo_status IN ('Discontinue', 'in progress')),

    PRIMARY KEY (pos_id, term_code));

    >> The requirement is I want to iterate [ugh, in a set-oriented declarative language?] each row and compare the current [sic] row pos_id with the previous [sic] row and if there is a different pos_id found then I want to insert 2 rows in between in such a way that the 1st inserted row's status for that previous pos_id will be "In Progress" and true and 2nd inserted row's status will be discontinued and false and term code of both these 2 inserted rows will be Term code of new pos_id of the current row.

    INSERT INTO Foobar

    VALUES ('TR', '101', 'in progress'), ('TR', '102', 'in progress'),

    ('TR' , '103', 'in progress'), ('CA', '151', 'in progress'),

    ('CA', '152', 'in progress'), ('DA', '161', 'in progress');

    Please post DDL and follow ANSI/ISO standards when asking for help. 

  • Hi there -- thank you for the points 🙂  It wasn't clear to me it's OK to use the uniqueid to order the results.  Windowing functions are permitted in the ORDER BY clause as well as the SELECT list.  Something like this

    select pos_id, term_code, [status], isactive
    from #input_Main_data md
    order by first_value(uniqueid) over (partition by pos_id order by term_code),
    pos_id, term_code, isactive desc;

    Aus dem Paradies, das Cantor uns geschaffen, soll uns niemand vertreiben können

  • This was removed by the editor as SPAM

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply