August 21, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Jamie Longstreet (8/21/2009)
Excellent question.First because it demonstrates the MERGE,
Second because it illustrates the $action,
Nice one!
Actually, I was going to say much the same but got a bit sidetracked by the answer confusion... I didn't know about MERGE before but thanks to this QotD it's clear how it works and it will be most helpful in solving a problem I have at work without resorting to extra and less efficient processing.
Cheers!
August 22, 2009 at 7:28 am
Jamie Longstreet (8/21/2009)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent question.
First because it demonstrates the MERGE,
Second because it illustrates the $action,
Nice one!
dave.farmer
Actually, I was going to say much the same but got a bit sidetracked by the answer confusion... I didn't know about MERGE before but thanks to this QotD it's clear how it works and it will be most helpful in solving a problem I have at work without resorting to extra and less efficient processing.Cheers!
Thank you for your responses, it is satisfying to recieve affirmation that the QOD has achieved at least a portion of its objective.
September 1, 2009 at 9:09 am
Good question!
November 20, 2009 at 10:50 pm
I was lucky :hehe: I got it right!
March 19, 2010 at 9:59 pm
A nice question. I was lucky enough to see it after the wording was changed to reduce the number of correct answers to one.
But I do feel that this question illustrates how nasty MERGE is - we were better off without it, at least from the point of view of code clarity.
Tom
Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy