Service Broker Disconnected Conversations

  • mkdm

    SSC Eights!

    Points: 880

    Comments posted to this topic are about the item Service Broker Disconnected Conversations

  • Stewart "Arturius" Campbell

    SSC Guru

    Points: 71401

    That is interesting, thanks for the question.

    Have never used a "fire & forget" pattern myself...

    ____________________________________________
    Space, the final frontier? not any more...
    All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
    “libera tute vulgaris ex”

  • Jignesh Pro

    SSC Enthusiast

    Points: 168

    That's good to know,

    As per me END CONVERSATION related option should also be correct as it will also limit the number of inactive connection.

    Please explain on is this a valid consideration ?

     

  • mkdm

    SSC Eights!

    Points: 880

    The recommended pattern in any conversation is:

    1. Target service ends conversation.
    2. Initiator service receives "End Conversation" message and responds by ending the conversation on its end.

    In cases where the initiator can't reasonably respond to the "End Conversation" message, the simplest solution is to enable a queue activation stored procedure that ends the conversation on its behalf.

    • This reply was modified 4 months ago by  mkdm.
  • mkdm

    SSC Eights!

    Points: 880

    Stewart "Arturius" Campbell wrote:

    That is interesting, thanks for the question. Have never used a "fire & forget" pattern myself...

    That's a good thing. 🙂

    • This reply was modified 4 months ago by  mkdm.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply