April 18, 2012 at 9:06 pm
I chose "1" as the default start value because I thought it would have the same behaviour of the IDENTITY property which defaults to "start with 1, increment 1". Seems I must study more closely this welcome new feature.
That means one less problem converting code to/from Oracle. 🙂
Best regards,
Andre Guerreiro Neto
Database Analyst
http://www.softplan.com.br
MCITPx1/MCTSx2/MCSE/MCSA
April 19, 2012 at 9:30 pm
Nice question. Got it wrong and learned something in the process 🙂 And sequences will be SQL 2012 exam questions so this is a great help.
April 23, 2012 at 8:19 pm
Good question on a new feature. Thanks for submitting.
http://brittcluff.blogspot.com/
May 21, 2012 at 2:21 am
Britt Cluff (4/23/2012)
Good question on a new feature. Thanks for submitting.
+1
Thanks
August 3, 2012 at 5:46 am
I don't have 2012 yet , I went through msdn
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff878091.aspx
I thought the answer would be min(bigint)+1 ; and that wasn't listed ; didn't understand the defaults ..
guess need to dig out more..
~ demonfox
___________________________________________________________________
Wondering what I would do next , when I am done with this one :ermm:
January 9, 2013 at 6:30 am
Before answering referred BOL many times, so i got it correct..
--
Dineshbabu
Desire to learn new things..
Viewing 6 posts - 31 through 36 (of 36 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply