Refactoring

Question

Post reply

Refactoring

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

SSC Guru

Points: 738171
More actions
February 23, 2011 at 9:04 pm

#235450

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Refactoring

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Koen Verbeeck SSC Guru Points: 259165 More actions · Answer 1

Nice question, thanks.

I voted for the connect issue.

Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

M&M SSC-Insane Points: 21700 More actions · Answer 2

Thanks for the question, I had no idea about it though

M&M

SkyBVI SSCoach Points: 15128 More actions · Answer 3

SkyBVI

SSCoach

Points: 15128

February 24, 2011 at 6:02 am

#1290904

very tough question

Regards
Sushant Kumar
MCTS,MCP

Daniel Bowlin SSC-Dedicated Points: 34566 More actions · Answer 4

Lots of really good questions in QoTD lately. Including this one. Thanks.

SanDroid SSChampion Points: 10068 More actions · Answer 5

Steve,

Are these options the same in all three versions of Visual Studio that had a Database edition?

I obviously got it right, but just curious why you did not specify.:w00t:

danschl SSCertifiable Points: 5770 More actions · Answer 6

http://johannesbrodwall.com/2010/10/13/database-refactoring-replace-table-with-view/#

I missed this because i found this website

SanDroid SSChampion Points: 10068 More actions · Answer 7

danschl (2/24/2011)
http://johannesbrodwall.com/2010/10/13/database-refactoring-replace-table-with-view/#
I missed this because i found this website

Nice article but I did not read anything in it about the options in the Visual Studio Database/Refactor menu when you have a database project open.

TomThomson SSC Guru Points: 104773 More actions · Answer 8

Interesting question.

Unhelpful explanation with no reference to documentation. I was unable to find anything useful except http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ronang/archive/2007/08/13/db-pro-power-tools-including-t-sql-analysis-dependency-viewing-and-more-refactoring-options.aspx%5Dthis (and a repost of it elswhere in the msdn website) and the earlier blog entry that it references.

I'm not at all clear what the connect entry means - the originator hasn't responded to the question raised in the MS response so it isn't clear what he was suggesting; nor is it at all clear to me whether the suggestion is to replace the table in just the single selected FROM clause (in which case I don't think it's worth cluttering the GUI with it) or in some wider scope (which might make it useful) which isn't defined in the proposal. So I won't be voting for it, because I have no real idea what is being asked for. Nor will I vbote against it (for the same reason).

Tom

UMG Developer SSChampion Points: 13482 More actions · Answer 9

Interesting question, thanks! On the connect item it is listed as closed with "a custom resolution." So I am not sure voting for it is very valuable at this point.

Steve Jones - SSC Editor SSC Guru Points: 738171 More actions · Answer 10

My apologies, This was a question from Jamie Thomson and I have corrected that.

I have no idea what options there are in various editions of the tools.

SanDroid SSChampion Points: 10068 More actions · Answer 11

Steve Jones - SSC Editor (2/24/2011)
My apologies, This was a question from Jamie Thomson and I have corrected that.
I have no idea what options there are in various editions of the tools.

Thank you Steve for making that clear.

I should know that you would never post an ambiguous question about application features without at least specifying the version it was for.

Unless the Edit Question function is not working.

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281344 More actions · Answer 12

Thanks for the question.

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

Refactoring

Cookies on SQLServerCentral