Post reply

Refactoring

  • February 23, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    #235450

    Comments posted to this topic are about the item Refactoring

  • February 24, 2011 at 1:07 am

    #1290763

    Nice question, thanks.

    I voted for the connect issue.

    Need an answer? No, you need a question
    My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
    MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

  • February 24, 2011 at 1:51 am

    #1290774

    Thanks for the question, I had no idea about it though

    M&M

  • February 24, 2011 at 6:02 am

    #1290904

    very tough question

    Regards
    Sushant Kumar
    MCTS,MCP

  • February 24, 2011 at 7:09 am

    #1290956

    Lots of really good questions in QoTD lately. Including this one. Thanks.

  • February 24, 2011 at 8:55 am

    #1291044

    Steve,

    Are these options the same in all three versions of Visual Studio that had a Database edition?

    I obviously got it right, but just curious why you did not specify.:w00t:

  • February 24, 2011 at 8:58 am

    #1291046

    http://johannesbrodwall.com/2010/10/13/database-refactoring-replace-table-with-view/#

    I missed this because i found this website

  • February 24, 2011 at 9:03 am

    #1291050

    danschl (2/24/2011)

    http://johannesbrodwall.com/2010/10/13/database-refactoring-replace-table-with-view/#

    I missed this because i found this website

    Nice article but I did not read anything in it about the options in the Visual Studio Database/Refactor menu when you have a database project open.

  • February 24, 2011 at 9:42 am

    #1291071

    Interesting question.

    Unhelpful explanation with no reference to documentation. I was unable to find anything useful except http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ronang/archive/2007/08/13/db-pro-power-tools-including-t-sql-analysis-dependency-viewing-and-more-refactoring-options.aspx]this (and a repost of it elswhere in the msdn website) and the earlier blog entry that it references.

    I'm not at all clear what the connect entry means - the originator hasn't responded to the question raised in the MS response so it isn't clear what he was suggesting; nor is it at all clear to me whether the suggestion is to replace the table in just the single selected FROM clause (in which case I don't think it's worth cluttering the GUI with it) or in some wider scope (which might make it useful) which isn't defined in the proposal. So I won't be voting for it, because I have no real idea what is being asked for. Nor will I vbote against it (for the same reason).

    Tom

  • February 24, 2011 at 10:09 am

    #1291093

    Interesting question, thanks! On the connect item it is listed as closed with "a custom resolution." So I am not sure voting for it is very valuable at this point.

  • February 24, 2011 at 10:12 am

    #1291097

    My apologies, This was a question from Jamie Thomson and I have corrected that.

    I have no idea what options there are in various editions of the tools.

  • February 24, 2011 at 11:11 am

    #1291145

    Steve Jones - SSC Editor (2/24/2011)

    My apologies, This was a question from Jamie Thomson and I have corrected that.

    I have no idea what options there are in various editions of the tools.

    Thank you Steve for making that clear.

    I should know that you would never post an ambiguous question about application features without at least specifying the version it was for.

    Unless the Edit Question function is not working. 😉

  • February 25, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    #1291777

    Thanks for the question.

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply