Reconciliation Approach

Question

Post reply

Reconciliation Approach

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

WayneS SSC Guru Points: 95461 More actions · Answer 1

I don't know what "large" means for you, and this will make a difference.

And it also makes a difference in what version of SQL Server you're on: 2005 or 2008/R2?

If your on one of the 2008 versions, I'd recommend using the MERGE statement to do all of this.

And if you're on 2005, I'd actually recommend using DELETE, UPDATE and INSERT statements to do what you need.

Yep, I'd skip SSIS completely with this.

Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes

If you can't explain to another person how the code that you're copying from the internet works, then DON'T USE IT on a production system! After all, you will be the one supporting it!

Links:
For better assistance in answering your questions
Performance Problems
Common date/time routines
Understanding and Using APPLY Part 1 & Part 2

Raunak Jhawar SSCoach Points: 15701 More actions · Answer 2

imani_technology (10/5/2010)
And so on. If there is a row in the destination that was not in the source, then the row should be DELETED from the destination. If the row in the destination is different from the equivalent row in the source, the destination row should be UPDATED. If the row in the source does not have an equivalent in the destination, the row should be INSERTED into the destination.

WayneS (10/5/2010)
If your on one of the 2008 versions, I'd recommend using the MERGE statement to do all of this.
And if you're on 2005, I'd actually recommend using DELETE, UPDATE and INSERT statements to do what you need.

I have few questions:

Why not implement the SCD transformation for the above dataset.

For the DELETED Part Left join would suffice

Raunak J

Raunak Jhawar SSCoach Points: 15701 More actions · Answer 3

Also these days everybody is talking a lot about Change Data Capture...which is also a worth time for this issue

Raunak J

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 4

We are using SQL Server 2008 R2. From what I understand, we are going to deal with about a million rows.

Raunak Jhawar SSCoach Points: 15701 More actions · Answer 5

imani_technology (10/5/2010)
We are using SQL Server 2008 R2. From what I understand, we are going to deal with about a million rows.

This really shouldn't blow your brains off when you are dealing with data warehousing :-):-):-)

Raunak J

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 6

I agree, but my boss thinks the performance will be better if I break the data up into 15-day chunks. Do you think that would be necessary? It would be nice if we could skip the looping.

Raunak Jhawar SSCoach Points: 15701 More actions · Answer 7

It is always better to load only the changed data to the warehouse. Yes your "BOSS" stands correct!!!:-)

Raunak J

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 8

Yes, but he wants me to compare and change the data in 15-day chunks. Would putting that into a loop necessarily boost performance?

Raunak Jhawar SSCoach Points: 15701 More actions · Answer 9

You must understand that implementing a MDM or CDC is far superior than batch loading...the CDC actually tries to eliminate the batch window(15 day in your case)

Give some time and study the CDC methodology:-)

Raunak J

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 10

The boss would like us to move toward an MDM scenario. Where can I learn more about that in a Microsoft context?

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 11

Thanks for the insight! I have done some research on CDC, which is leading me to more questions. Is it okay for me to start a new thread reagarding Oracle, SSIS, and CDC?

Raunak Jhawar SSCoach Points: 15701 More actions · Answer 12

Absolutely. But remember not to cross post.:-)

Raunak J

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 13

How about this?

If

source.Inventory_Item_Id = destination.Inventory_Item_Id

AND

source.Creation_Date = destination.Creation_Date

AND

source.Last_Updated_Date <> destination.Last_Updated_Date

Then start "reconciliation" process.

Can I use a Lookup to do this? Will this properly prevent too many source rows from being processed?

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 14

Also, is the looping process that the boss wants really necessary? Is breaking up the data into 15-day chunks going to improve performance or slow it down? After all we're only talking about a miliion rows or so.

imani_technology SSCrazy Eights Points: 8200 More actions · Answer 15

I have partially answered my own question. If I check by

If

source.Inventory_Item_Id = destination.Inventory_Item_Id

AND

source.Creation_Date = destination.Creation_Date

AND

source.Last_Updated_Date <> destination.Last_Updated_Date

That won't take into account deleted records. So I guess I'll have to do a script task that gets a source rowcount and a destination rowcount and compares the two. Am I on the right path?