RAID 10

  • Comments posted to this topic are about the item RAID 10

  • Thanks for the question...these RAID questions are nice, they let you think a bit 😉

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This thing is addressing problems that dont exist. Its solution-ism at its worst. We are dumbing down machines that are inherently superior. - Gilfoyle

  • Dammit, I got it wrong because of this misleading quote in Wikipedia:

    RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks)

    On most other sites I've found 4 as a minimum. (after I've answered the question of course)

    Damn you Wikipedia, you have fooled me once again! 🙂

    Need an answer? No, you need a question
    My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
    MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

  • Koen Verbeeck (3/3/2011)


    Dammit, I got it wrong because of this misleading quote in Wikipedia:

    RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks)

    On most other sites I've found 4 as a minimum. (after I've answered the question of course)

    Damn you Wikipedia, you have fooled me once again! 🙂

    Same for me.

  • This was removed by the editor as SPAM

  • Thanks for the question. I took a chance and got it right 🙂

    There were conflicting answers on the net.

    Learnt something as well through QotD.

    For RAID5 minimum number of drives is 3

    For RAID10 minimum number of drives is 4.

    M&M

  • I was about to answer 4 from my own knowledge but then looked it up to be sure and found this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels

    It quotes:

    RAID 10 can be implemented with as few as two disks. Implementations supporting two disks such as Linux RAID10 offer a choice of layouts, including one in which copies of a block of data are "near" each other or at the same address on different devices or predictably offset: Each disk access is split into full-speed disk accesses to different drives, yielding read and write performance like RAID0 but without necessarily guaranteeing every stripe is on both drives.

    Therefore, the correct answer should be 2 like I answered. Usually it's 4 but there is this possibility of 2 and the question asked for the minimum not the "usual."

  • I went against my better judgement and answered 2 - since I also read

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels

    Oh well - Nice to know I'm not the only one - though next time I'll trust myself.

  • Well, this time I shouldn't have done the research...

    I read the exact article that was quoted in the question, and found this quote:

    RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity.

    So I answered 2, rather than 4. My bad for believing wikipedia, I guess - and my surprise that this article was the one that was cited for the reference.

    -Ki

    -Ki

  • Yeah, I think a lot of people are going to get this "wrong" since we read the Wikipedia article. Which, hilariously, is linked in the answer.

  • Hmmmm. If it hadn't linked the Wikipedia article I got the wrong answer of 2 from I'd have been fine, but when the reference quoted in the real answer supports what I said but the answer doesn't...

  • I like a lot of people answered two for the same reason

    RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity

    The question was not the best optimal configuration but the minimum.

  • I have to agree that most are going to fail this one because of conflicting information. Question specifies "minimum" not "optimal". 🙁

  • Should have trusted my own instincts. Wikipedia ruined my ans.

  • I would have sworn that the RAID 1+0 was 4 in Wikipedia, and I have submitted a correction.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply