integer lengths (II)

Question

integer lengths (II)

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

TomThomson SSC Guru Points: 104773 More actions · Answer 1

Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/6/2015)
Answer is corrected.

Not quite - it's slightly wronger than before, because as well as the wrong number (which hasn't changed) it now has acquired a thousands-separator comma in the wrong place in one of the numbers that was right. :hehe:

Tom

WilburBud SSCrazy Points: 2914 More actions · Answer 2

TomThomson (7/6/2015)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/6/2015)
Answer is corrected.
Not quite - it's slightly wronger than before, because as well as the wrong number (which hasn't changed) it now has acquired a thousands-separator comma in the wrong place in one of the numbers that was right. :hehe:

+1

TomThomson SSC Guru Points: 104773 More actions · Answer 3

Steve's refixed his fix - I think it's right now.

Tom

Hany Helmy SSChampion Points: 13921 More actions · Answer 4

TomThomson (7/7/2015)
Steve's refixed his fix - I think it's right now.

Yep, Thanx.

Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant

Revenant SSC-Forever Points: 42467 More actions · Answer 5

It looks that sometimes it is better to get to answer QotD after a long weekend.

Thanks, Tom!

DonlSimpson SSCertifiable Points: 7043 More actions · Answer 6

This kind of underscores why I prefer to do formatting for display in the presentation layer.

Don Simpson

I'm not sure about Heisenberg.

integer lengths (II)

Cookies on SQLServerCentral