August 4, 2012 at 11:52 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Index types 1
August 5, 2012 at 10:29 pm
Nice question, Got to learn something new
~ Lokesh Vij
Link to my Blog Post --> www.SQLPathy.com[/url]
Follow me @Twitter
August 5, 2012 at 10:31 pm
thanks for the question;learned about xml indexes .
~ demonfox
___________________________________________________________________
Wondering what I would do next , when I am done with this one :ermm:
August 6, 2012 at 12:39 am
Very nice question Hugo, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
August 6, 2012 at 12:43 am
Great Question Hugo - thanks.
Had to do a lot of reading to check what I already seemed to know, but taught me more about what I didn't know.
August 6, 2012 at 12:51 am
Good question - makes you think a bit.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
August 6, 2012 at 1:44 am
BrainDonor (8/6/2012)
The detailed disclaimer made me laugh - trying to pre-empt any complaints?
Let's just say that this is not my first QotD submission... :w00t:
By the way, the "please select 3" notice was added by the editor, not me. I only added the "multiple correct answers", but deliberately omitted the number of correct answers, and I am actually a bit disappointed that this number was added.
August 6, 2012 at 1:51 am
Well that's got the brain ticking over quite nicely now. Thanks Hugo!
August 6, 2012 at 3:18 am
Oof! fluked this one.
Knew the first 2 were right, and that columnstore was non-clustered. Guessed it was probably an XML index and decided "for value" would be more useful.
Phew!
_____________________________________________________________________
[font="Comic Sans MS"]"The difficult tasks we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer"[/font]
August 6, 2012 at 3:29 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
August 6, 2012 at 5:12 am
Too much for me to handle on Monday morning. Nice question.
August 6, 2012 at 6:19 am
I over thought this one, and knew I was doing it, but still did it anyway. My thinking was that, while you do not have to define a clustered index as unique, SQL Server does add a uniqufier, thus I eliminated non-unique clustered index. See what I mean about over-thinking?
Jack Corbett
Consultant - Straight Path Solutions
Check out these links on how to get faster and more accurate answers:
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Need an Answer? Actually, No ... You Need a Question
August 6, 2012 at 6:25 am
BrainDonor (8/6/2012)
The detailed disclaimer made me laugh - trying to pre-empt any complaints?
I don't blame him. I've decided I'll have to retain an attorney before I do another QotD.
Thanks, Hugo, for the question. But it was a bit too much for me for a Monday. I don't use non-unique clustered indexes, so I got lost looking for the right answer.
[font="Verdana"]Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.[/font]
Connect to me on LinkedIn
August 6, 2012 at 6:56 am
Thanks for the question Hugo!
I had to research the XML indexes again... not something I use.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy