Help with Move from 2000 to 2005 performance

  • Hi guys,

    We have our main production SQL server in a VM cluster for high availability. I just recently set up a 2005 sp2 x64 (Win2k3R2x64) box in the same cluster and migrated the databases over. Here's the config notes:

    VMWare Settings:

    VM: Reserved Memory 8192 MB - 1 CPU

    VM Pool: Reserved Memory 12288 MB - 1 CPU @ 6144 MHz All shares HIGH/UNLIMITED

    Uses iSCSI Drives - Persistent and Bound - All drives aligned.

    C: SQL 2005 OS - 30GB - 12288MB Page File

    D: SQLLogs - 70GB

    E: SQLData - 120GB

    F: SQLTestDBs - 120GB

    G: SQLSysDbs - 20GB (tempdb)

    SQL Server Properties:

    Memory: Min:6144MB - Unlimited, Use AWE

    Processor: Boost SQL Priority

    Database Settings: Default Locations - E:\SQLData, D:\SQLLogs

    All other settings set to default.

    Database Mail configured

    FailSafe Operator configured

    Uses Integrated Windows and SQL Authentication - about 1000 users

    Sounds weird, but I swear this thing moves slower than te old SQL 2000 server. I'm not having issues, but I swear I didn't get any performance boost whatsoever by going with SQL on x64.

    Is there anything I can do to tweak the system?

    Thanks!!

    Tina Tysinger

    MCP, MCSE, MCDBA, VCP

  • HI there, have you tried the usual stuff? Like rebuilding/reorganizing your fragmented indexes or updating your tables statistics? have you check your server counters with sys.dm_os_performance_counters? what kind of waits is your server experiencing (sys.dm_os_wait_stats)?

    It's weird my friend, maybe some of this things will help you out in getting higher performance. I am doing a migration from sqlServer 7.0 to sqlServer 2k5, and I can´t still get a higher performance from 2k5. I am thinking on rewriting some code (specially cursors) which are not improving my performance in spite of the fact that they run a lot faster in 7.0 :ermm: good luck! if I happen to find something I shall post it.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply