May 4, 2008 at 3:30 pm
How big are those tables? How many pages?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
May 5, 2008 at 12:36 pm
They are very small tables, 1 page and a dozen to 2 dozen rows. I doubt they are a performance issue, but why does the Logical Fragmentation go to 100?
Thanks,
Tim
May 5, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Because fragmentation has very little meaning on such small tables. Logical fragmentation is defined as the number of out of order pages. With only 1 page in the table it's meaningless.
Don't worry about it.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
May 5, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Thanks, it was more curiosity not worry 😀
May 5, 2008 at 1:41 pm
GilaMonster (5/5/2008)
Because fragmentation has very little meaning on such small tables. Logical fragmentation is defined as the number of out of order pages. With only 1 page in the table it's meaningless.Don't worry about it.
How large do tables have to be to start showing effects of fragmentation (in rows or pages)?
http://90.212.51.111 domain
May 5, 2008 at 2:16 pm
I can't remember offhand. I did read it somewhere.
I think it's around 100 pages, but don't quote me on that. I'll see if I can find the source article tomorrow.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
May 5, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Thanks
http://90.212.51.111 domain
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply