March 30, 2009 at 7:20 am
Do view source on any forum page and look at the js "Brush" modules right at the top:
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shCore.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushCpp.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushCSharp.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushCss.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushJava.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushJScript.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushPhp.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushPlain.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushSql.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushVb.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/shared/syntaxhighlighter/scripts/shBrushXml.js"></script>'
(Hmm, looks like I was wrong about the XML, you still have to put in the "& lt;" codes)
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 30, 2009 at 7:29 am
The real hard part was figuring out how to spell the tag labels. They're case-sensitive and not generally capitalized the same as they appear above.
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 30, 2009 at 8:34 am
I've asked for a full documentation and I'll add these to the shortcuts on the left.
We used the same algorithm in the blogs and articles, so we should support a few different languages. I think the "code" tag is for T-SQL and the "code2" is for XML.
not sure about CSharp, but I'll get them added.
March 30, 2009 at 8:53 am
Here's what I have so far that works:
[ code ] for SQL,
[ code="csharp" ] for C#
[ code="vb" ] for VB.net
[ code="xml" ] for XML
bit i still have to use "& lt;" and "& gt;" for "<" and ">".
(note: I added extra spaces to prevent these from being translated as tags)
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 30, 2009 at 9:03 am
Steve Jones - Editor (3/30/2009)
I think the "code" tag is for T-SQL and the "code2" is for XML.
Testing XML
[code2]
[/code2]
Edit: Nope.
I notice that the ADDADD is still there.
-- Testing single quotes within comments '
Print 'String 1'
Print 'String 2'
Edit: Looks like that's still broken too.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 30, 2009 at 9:21 am
Hmm, maybe something changed. I'll get the code list and post it.
No changes yet since the release last week. There is development starting today for release next week.
March 31, 2009 at 4:52 am
RBarryYoung (3/30/2009)
Here's what I have so far that works:[ code ] for SQL,
[ code="csharp" ] for C#
[ code="vb" ] for VB.net
[ code="xml" ] for XML
bit i still have to use "& lt;" and "& gt;" for "<" and ">".
(note: I added extra spaces to prevent these from being translated as tags)
That implies that the new [ code ] formatter might produce strange effects on old [ code ] blocks if they weren't SQL. I know I've used code blocks for results etc where I wanted fixed font.
BTW, does [ code="sql" ] work as well if you want to be explicit about it?
Derek
March 31, 2009 at 7:41 am
Derek Dongray (3/31/2009)
RBarryYoung (3/30/2009)
Here's what I have so far that works:[ code ] for SQL,
[ code="csharp" ] for C#
[ code="vb" ] for VB.net
[ code="xml" ] for XML
bit i still have to use "& lt;" and "& gt;" for "<" and ">".
(note: I added extra spaces to prevent these from being translated as tags)
That implies that the new [ code ] formatter might produce strange effects on old [ code ] blocks if they weren't SQL. I know I've used code blocks for results etc where I wanted fixed font.
Yes, exactly. I spent much of last weekend trying to find old posts of mine that were messed up and fixing them. I am sure that I didn't find nearly all of them.
BTW, does [ code="sql" ] work as well if you want to be explicit about it?
I haven't tried it yet.
Let's try it now:
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2000-1-1','2000-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2000-1-1','2001-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2000)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2001-1-1','2001-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2001-1-1','2002-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2001)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2002-1-1','2002-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2002-1-1','2003-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2002)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2003-1-1','2003-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2003-1-1','2004-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2003)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2004-1-1','2004-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2004-1-1','2005-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2004)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2005-1-1','2005-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2005-1-1','2006-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2005)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2006-1-1','2006-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2006-1-1','2007-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2006)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2007-1-1','2007-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2007-1-1','2008-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2007)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2008-1-1','2008-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2008-1-1','2009-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2008)
SELECT DATEDIFF(WK,'2009-1-1','2009-12-31'), DATEDIFF(WK,'2009-1-1','2010-1-1'), dbo.fnWeeksInYear(2009)
Yep. Looks good.
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 31, 2009 at 10:22 am
I'm now just seeing everythign as plain fixed font. Has it all been switched off?
Or is my browser playing up?
Derek
March 31, 2009 at 11:21 am
Looks good to me. I am using Firefox 3.0.8.
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 31, 2009 at 11:22 am
Have you disabled macros or javascript?
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
April 1, 2009 at 1:57 am
RBarryYoung (3/31/2009)
Have you disabled macros or javascript?
Not deliberately! 🙂
But after some other checking I found that Javascript wasn't working and eventually fixed it by "regsvr32 jscript" so it's OK now!
The only update I had yesterday was for iTunes. Can't think why that (or anything else) would unregister jscript.
Observed side-effect: System Restore won't start; it just gives a blank window; it must use jscript! Very helpful! A restore program which can't work if things are broken in a particular way! :w00t:
Derek
September 30, 2009 at 10:38 am
New code formatting engine: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic794401-83-1.aspx
Viewing 13 posts - 31 through 42 (of 42 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply