Case Study Scenario Exercise about SQL Server 2008 R2 instances.

  • A company offers financial services for its clients.For the company,

    when talking about client's financial transactions and their income,

    it is very important to not lose any of transactions due to a failure

    of an IT system. Every day is generated a large amount of data and for

    their management, the company uses SQL Server 2008 R2 instances.

    The company needs to build a system which does not allow data loss

    even if it happens a small failure of the system, any transaction which

    is not committed from the client, should not lose.

    The company system should provide a high availability of data in every

    moment and the company does not want to change the version of SQL

    Server instances because this would lead to additional cost.

    The main elements that will effect in a successful implementation of the

    company system are:

    Infrastructure of the network and servers

    Infrastructure used for storing data

    Automatic failover

    Copies of data shared in more than two servers,placed far from each other

    Exploitation of data space through compression technique

    Provide a design of an hardware and software system infrastructure of

    the company which would provide the solution of each of the above

    requirements providing this way a successful implementation.

  • This looks like something from an exam or interview?

    You haven't really asked a question, nor tried to answer. I would suggest you look over the HA section in SQL Server 2008 Books Online

  • The first thing I'd recommend is not using 2008 R2.

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply