November 30, 2004 at 2:02 pm
November 30, 2004 at 9:22 pm
While I can't directly answer your question of 'why Siebel can't use SQL 2000 in a non binary sort order' - that requirement is set by the vendor - I can give you some info that may help so that you do not have to change the sort order for our SQL Server installation.
The good news is, in SQL Server 2000, you may set the sort order/collation at the database level. So, you can set the Siebel db for binary, w/o affecting the other dbs and the entire server sort order.
Check out books on-line for the exact syntax. It looks like Alter database Siebel collate (binary sort order)
Hope that helps!
March 1, 2007 at 9:57 am
The Answer is NO. Siebel is not going to work you will face problems with some views and when you upgrade to other versions. S
iebel always recomends to use binary sort Order.
Example : It should look like this when you query DB
Character Set = 1, iso_1
ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1) - Western European 8-bit character set.
Sort Order = 50, bin_iso_1
Binary Sort Order for the ISO 8859-1 (Latin 1) Character Set
Locale ID = 33280 -This represents Binary sort order.
Hope this helps
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply