January 24, 2025 at 12:00 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Boosting Data Accuracy: Resolving Common Data Quality Issues Using SQL
February 4, 2025 at 9:07 am
Helpful tip re Collation - thanks!
Leaving the employee as NULL is often operationally identical to 'Unknown'. In the market that I usually serve, users tend to enter 'unknown' (variously misspelled) , 'tba', 'tbc' in all manner of nullable fields, when leaving empty (null) would state the same.
Thoughts?
February 4, 2025 at 6:17 pm
From a data readability and governance perspective, enforcing values in place of NULL improves efficiency - again based on downstream reporting needs. This would avoids unnecessary string comparisons and simplifies downstream processing. However, if the distinction between 'intentionally unspecified' vs. 'truly unknown' matters for business logic, then having a standardized placeholder like 'UNKNOWN' might be justifiable—though it should be system-enforced rather than user-driven to prevent inconsistencies.
A better approach is to implement data validation at the UI level, guiding users to either leave the field empty (NULL) or select a structured option from a predefined list (e.g., 'Not Assigned' vs. 'TBD'). This ensures clean, structured data while maintaining operational clarity. These are based on my experiences as we have seen that in few applications NULL is not handled well leading to errors
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply