Post reply

BOL Update

  • January 21, 2004 at 8:28 am

    #490995

    Do either of you have an SQL80.chw (~ 5+ MB) dated appropriately?

    I think that's the one.

    Sorry, edited chm -> chw.



    Once you understand the BITs, all the pieces come together

  • January 21, 2004 at 8:31 am

    #490996

    You mean SQL80EN.chw ?

    That one is dated 01/20/2004 and about 5.3 MB in size

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  • January 21, 2004 at 9:00 am

    #490997

    Frank, the "en" is most likely because you have the ENglish BOL on a German language O/S ???

    I just have to SQL80.??? files.

    Copied the tsqlref.chm (2MB), got "mismatch version" message, copied the tsqlref.chi and the "direct to T-SQL BOL" works now, and I get the "©1988-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved."

    Copied SQL80.COL, CHW, CHS files, got "Help" dialog - " Can not open ... SQL80.col.... if I use the original SQL80.col, with the newer .CHW, CHS files, it loads, but shows the "1988-2000 MS Corp...". Any particular place in the help I can look to see if the actual contents are from 2004?



    Once you understand the BITs, all the pieces come together

  • January 21, 2004 at 3:18 pm

    #491042

    Thomas,

    yes, I have intentionally installed the updated english version (I don't understand the technical terms that are translated into german anymore)

    As for easy checking:

    On the start page of BOL is a link to 'What's new in BOL online'. If you follow that link you should see

      Topic last updated -- January 2004

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  • January 21, 2004 at 3:26 pm

    #491045

    I still see "What's New in Microsoft SQL Server 2000"

    Could be the "contents" comes from the .COL file ????

    How about something I can look for in the details somewhere?

    At least my TSQLref is 2004 (I hope, since that what is says).

    Mostly just care about TSQL anyway



    Once you understand the BITs, all the pieces come together

  • January 21, 2004 at 3:38 pm

    #491046

    Aargh, there was a QOD on this topic.

    IIRC, I think you're right, but it wouldn't hurt to search the QOD archive.

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
    My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

  • January 21, 2004 at 3:44 pm

    #491048

    OK, will do tomorrow... heading out for the day

    Thanks

    PS, Awful late in the day for you Frank



    Once you understand the BITs, all the pieces come together

Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply