January 25, 2019 at 2:32 pm
Would someone please look in a 2017 SSIS package and post the PackageFormatVersion value? I expect that it is 9 but I want to confirm. It is certainly missing from the doco.
January 26, 2019 at 7:06 pm
GeorgeCopeland - Friday, January 25, 2019 2:32 PMWould someone please look in a 2017 SSIS package and post the PackageFormatVersion value? I expect that it is 9 but I want to confirm. It is certainly missing from the doco.
I cannot see this property:
January 27, 2019 at 7:17 am
in the project file
<DtsPackage FormatVersion="8">
in the package itself
DTS:LastModifiedProductVersion="15.0.0900.40"
DTS:Name="PackageFormatVersion">8</DTS:Property>
this is with
Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2017 Version 15.9.6
SQL Server Data Tools 15.1.61901.03220
January 27, 2019 at 4:38 pm
Phil Parkin - Saturday, January 26, 2019 7:06 PMGeorgeCopeland - Friday, January 25, 2019 2:32 PMWould someone please look in a 2017 SSIS package and post the PackageFormatVersion value? I expect that it is 9 but I want to confirm. It is certainly missing from the doco.I cannot see this property:
Hi Phil, an SSIS package is an XML file. Package properties can be read by opening in a text editor.
January 27, 2019 at 4:38 pm
frederico_fonseca - Sunday, January 27, 2019 7:17 AMin the project file
<DtsPackage FormatVersion="8">
in the package itself
DTS:LastModifiedProductVersion="15.0.0900.40"
DTS:Name="PackageFormatVersion">8</DTS:Property>this is with
Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2017 Version 15.9.6
SQL Server Data Tools 15.1.61901.03220
Hi Fredrico, thank you very kindly. PackageFormatVersion was 8 for SQL 2014, 2016 and now 2017.
January 28, 2019 at 5:58 am
GeorgeCopeland - Sunday, January 27, 2019 4:38 PMHi Phil, an SSIS package is an XML file. Package properties can be read by opening in a text editor.
Well, thanks a lot for the patronising reply.
Next time someone asks you to "look in a 2017 SSIS package", I assume that instead of firing up SSDT, you'll open it with an XML editor.
January 28, 2019 at 6:48 am
Hi Phil, that reply was only patronizing in your own mind. I advise you not to take things so personally. Have a great day!
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy