In-memory tables in 60 seconds
As a SQL Server DBA or developer here is what you should know about memory-optimizedtables (in-memory tables):
Introduced in SQL Server 2014Primary...
2016-10-13
296 reads
xSQL blog
In-memory tables in 60 seconds
As a SQL Server DBA or developer here is what you should know about memory-optimized tables (in-memory tables):
Introduced in SQL Server 2014
Primary store is main memory, second copy maintained on...
2016-10-13
3 reads
Stretch Databases in 60 seconds
SQL Server 2016 introduces Stretch Databases, a beautiful feature that by itself makes migrating to SQL 2016 worth it. What...
2016-10-12
225 reads
Stretch Databases in 60 seconds
SQL Server 2016 introduces Stretch Databases, a beautiful feature that by itself makes migrating to SQL 2016 worth it. What is it? A stretch database is basically a database...
2016-10-12
5 reads
Temporal Tables in 60 seconds
If you've ever designed a database you've most certainly run into the need for what we called history tables, those...
2016-10-11
428 reads
Temporal Tables in 60 seconds
If you've ever designed a database you've most certainly run into the need for what we called history tables, those tables that stored the history of row changes (sometimes...
2016-10-11
6 reads
Synchronizing NOT NULL Columns
Applies to: xSQL Schema Compare v7.0.0 – v 9.0.0, xSQL Data Compare v7.0.0 – v9.0.0
Description: Using xSQL Schema Compare and xSQL Data...
2016-10-06
416 reads
Synchronizing NOT NULL Columns
Applies to: xSQL Schema Compare v7.0.0 – v 9.0.0, xSQL Data
Compare v7.0.0 – v9.0.0
Description: Using
xSQL Schema Compare and xSQL Data Compare to keep the tables of two databases
in sync...
2016-10-06
7 reads
xSQL Schema/Data Compare database list is empty
Applies to: xSQL Schema Compare v 7.0.0 to v 9.0.0; xSQL Data Compare v 7.0.0 to v 9.0.0
Summary: When adding...
2016-09-21
327 reads
xSQL Schema/Data Compare database list is empty
Applies to: xSQL Schema Compare v 7.0.0 to v 9.0.0; xSQL Data Compare v 7.0.0 to v 9.0.0
Summary: When adding databases to the workspace both in xSQL Schema Compare...
2016-09-21
9 reads
Blogs
RANK() vs DENSE_RANK(): #SQLNewBlogger
By Steve Jones
I haven’t done one of these in awhile, but I saw an article recently...
Using CAT for Testing of Data Agents
In last months one of the scenarios where you can use AI has been...
Forums
Missing the Jaro Winkler Distance
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Missing the Jaro Winkler Distance
25 Years Later: What SQLServerCentral Meant to Me
Comments posted to this topic are about the item 25 Years Later: What SQLServerCentral...
Doing Good at SQL Server Central
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Doing Good at SQL Server...
Question of the Day
Missing the Jaro Winkler Distance
I upgraded a SQL Server 2019 instance to SQL Server 2025. I wanted to test the fuzzy string search functions. I run this code:
SELECT JARO_WINKLER_DISTANCE('tim', 'tom')
I get this error message:Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Line 1 'JARO_WINKLER_DISTANCE' is not a recognized built-in function name.What is wrong? See possible answers