SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


How to use Database mail feature in SQL Server 2000


How to use Database mail feature in SQL Server 2000

Author
Message
M&M
M&M
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 7299 Visits: 3913
Comments posted to this topic are about the item How to use Database mail feature in SQL Server 2000

M&M
Satnam Singh
Satnam Singh
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1258 Visits: 1084
Nice Article.
vk-kirov
vk-kirov
SSCarpal Tunnel
SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.5K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 4548 Visits: 4408
most of us are still working on older, SQL Server 2000 servers

Are there any statistics on this?!
Andeavour
Andeavour
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1370 Visits: 932
As a freelancer most of the sites I work at are still extensively 2000, with a few 2005 servers. Almost all the businesses I've worked with are still only just considering converting to SQL 2008, as the general consensus among big business (and especially local government) in the UK seems to be "if it works, leave it alone".

So from personal experience I would say 2000 use is still extensive.



josseluiss
josseluiss
Valued Member
Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 50 Visits: 44
Nice workaround, if you do have SQL 2005 indeed. Thus, why not to migrate your SQL 2000 dbs to SQL 2005?
Andeavour
Andeavour
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1370 Visits: 932
myxdev-apps (3/9/2010)
Thus, why not to migrate your SQL 2000 dbs to SQL 2005?


Lots of reasons. The business may not see a requirement to migrate the database, there may be elements that won't convert easily, they may not sanction the development time to re-write stored procs or convert hundreds of DTS packages. I've run into all these and more as reasons why companies don't migrate databases.



josseluiss
josseluiss
Valued Member
Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)Valued Member (50 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 50 Visits: 44
Andeavour (3/9/2010)
myxdev-apps (3/9/2010)
Thus, why not to migrate your SQL 2000 dbs to SQL 2005?


Lots of reasons.


Yes. I was wondering about the article, not your post, but the other side, those small companies thata can't afford a new SQL Server.

I agree with you that many companies won't upgrade their SQL 2000 for all it implies to them.
jinlye
jinlye
Valued Member
Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)Valued Member (52 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 52 Visits: 154
From the article:
It might take a few more years before all of the existing SQL Server 2000 applications are upgraded to newer versions of SQL Server.


SQL 2000 SP4 drops out of the extended support phase in April 2013. After that MS won't be doing any security patches, so security holes won't get fixed and your enterprise is at risk. So you need to be planning on upgrading within the next 36 months. http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=2852
r.stebbens 78867
r.stebbens 78867
SSC Veteran
SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)SSC Veteran (207 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 207 Visits: 162
RE : SQL 2000. I've been telling a client for more than 6 months that they should upgrade their server and move to at least SQL 2005. This week the 10 year old hardware failed. they are now upgrading by default :-D

Developer, DBA, Pre-Sales consultant.
Kick6Tiger
Kick6Tiger
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)SSC Eights! (961 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 961 Visits: 769
I still have to support a SQL 2000 instance for a vendor application that the business can't afford to upgrade at the moment. The new version of the software is a hosted system and very expensive. The current version does not support any SQL beyond 2000.

I don't find configuring SQL Mail on SQL 2000 to be very difficult, but it's nice to know there are options.

Aigle de Guerre!
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search