I've interviewed a bunch of people for DBA role. For me, cert or no cert comes in a package. I'm willing to pay good money for good skill. Ask me if I'll hire a person because of MCDBA, etc? NO WAY!! I've met people with great certs (heaps of them!) but couldnt answer my simple question of "Explain clustered index and what its good for". She instead talk to me about programming, ended up knowing she's from a programmer background.
For me, a degree, masters, phd, etc shows a person has gone through some pain and therefore would be a bit more responsible than a person without. Cert shows his skills should beat a beginner in the field. But there are tons of way I could easily test his/her knowledge in SQL. I've asked some interview questions which i got back "It depends". To be fair, i always try to paint a more complete picture to make sure i've got an exact (possible) answer.
Pay more just because of cert = its nut.
Pay a lot for skill = yes
Pay a lot for skill + cert = yes
Pay a lot for skill + cert + interpersonal skill = definitely (will only know after sometime working in the environment)
Not to say all degree, masters, cert, etc all are too important (nonetheless it does matter to some level), but you'll know someone after working with them for sometime..
I would like to raise what I believe is a major issue with the certification exams. This is, the fact that there is no way to find out which questions you got wrong and why.
I went into my certification exam (MCTS: SQL Server 2005) fully expecting to be able to answer every question correctly. I passed well but was frustrated by the fact that I could not find out where I went wrong. All they show you is general 'areas' where you could improve.
I understand that Microsoft is concerned that people will sell off the questions and answers, but I still think that not providing a list of questions which were answered incorrectly is unfair to the candidate. You have already seen the question, so where is the harm in showing it to you again, along with the incorrect answer that you chose. They don't have to show you the correct answer, it should be up to you to go back and see why you got it wrong.
I did raise this concern in my feedback for the exam, but would be interested in what others thought about this. This was my first experience with a Microsoft Certification Exam.
Sorry it took so long for me to respond. Just got back from Rhode Island yesterday. I'm glad you all enjoyed the article.
Several people bring up some good points. I'll definitely have to include the "Rescheduling in case of life events" comment in a future edition of the article.
Microsoft actually did used to (in some exams) tell you what your exact score was and, I believe, the questions you got wrong. However, it led to people memorizing the answers to those specific questions and passing the test on that merit instead of studying the whole topic and passing the test based on true understanding of the subject. I believe that's why so few certification programs use that format anymore. Yes, it is annoying, but I can understand the underlying situation. Who wants to hire someone who memorized specific answers?
Interviewer: "How do you do a point in time restore for a database in Simple recovery mode"
Memorizing Employee Canidate: "Open up SSMS, right-click Database and choose 'Restore Database'. "
Well, the answer is half correct, anyway. @=)
There are a few good indicators of questions you might have gotten wrong during the exam. 1) You changed your answer more than once, 2) You didn't actually understand the entire question, 3) You didn't recognize some of the acronyms or names in the question. I specifically say question here because MS is famous for making up weird answers (T-SQL commands, object labels) that don't truly exist in SQL Server just to throw people off track.
While you are not allowed to take paper out of the testing environment, I do recommend writing down a word or two about the topic you're having trouble with during the exam. Then after the exam, but before you leave the room, refresh your memory with the subject areas you were uncertain about. Once you leave the exam, with those subject areas in mind, you can go back and study them if you didn't pass. Your hand written note of "indexed views" will surely be a little more specific than the auto-generated topics list.
Does that help?
Oh, and I did mean to post a reply to one of the first questions on this thread. As others have said, unless you have the actual MCDBA certification, you can't take the "upgrade" route to MCITP.
Now, there's nothing actually stopping you from taking the actual upgrade exam (70-447) and the implementation exam (70-431). Prometric and the other testing centers don't know what certs you do and don't have. The problem comes when you actually send off to Microsoft for a copy of your certification. MS will simply send you a note back saying "Sorry, but you have several more exams you have to take before you can be an MCITP".
So, if you don't have your MCDBA, don't waste the money on 70-447. Unless you enjoy spending money on useless exams. @=)
Also, something I should have noted in my article. Microsoft no longer automatically sends out your actual certification package once you've passed your exams. You have to create an account on their site (if you don't already have one) and request it yourself once you've passed all your relevant exams. This cuts down on some of their administrative overhead and leaves the burden of certification proof squarely on your shoulders instead of theirs.
Hope that answers a few other questions.
Thankyou to those that responded to my earlier post.
I have to say that I still disagree with the idea of providing 'subject areas' that you need to improve on rather than the actual question(s) that you got wrong in the exam. Subject Areas in SQL Server can be very broad. For example, Replication or Security. I disagree that this is a good balance between showing no information at all and showing the incorrect questions in full.
I believe that learning from mistakes is one of the most effective ways to learn. Surely it's better to make a mistake on an exam, and learn exactly what you did wrong and why, rather than making this same mistake in a production environment where the repercussions are much more severe, and could even cost you your job.
As I said, I understand Microsoft's concerns but the current situation is unfair to exam takers. I believe most people's intention in taking these exam's is to improve their knowledge and to have something to show employers as evidence of their existing knowledge.