SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Interviews Part 2


Interviews Part 2

Author
Message
RUZHA
RUZHA
Valued Member
Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 53 Visits: 1

DBA is very broad profession these days. There is no more only production or development DBA's or just database architects. The companies require jacks-of-all-trades in this position. As a result of that DA become the generalists, which is very negative tendency to the quality of DBA's work and level of expertise.

I am sure the base was there and if you will give a person right structure to work in and time you will see the results. No one knows everything and we tend to forget things that we do not touch time. I bat you have some areas where you are not good.

The task in interview the reveal potentials of the candidate and his strongest sides.

You were trying elevate yourself. You need to get over your memory caused by junior level years and srat to think as a team leader if you want to mentor and get the results of of it. So, your attacks, to the person that is obviously not that great in query tuning anymore, is unfair and shows some level of insecurity in you.

Can you give me in short paragraph the guidelines for the developer to evaluate the query performance without looking at show plan?




A.V.R
RUZHA
RUZHA
Valued Member
Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 53 Visits: 1
My recent reply was related to the author of the article.


A.V.R
demicoq
demicoq
SSC-Enthusiastic
SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (109 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 109 Visits: 29
Well you had me entertained until you decided to send that sad excuse of an e-mail to the interviewee. It really showed your lact of tact and sadly you sent it from your company e-mail. It really showed an abuse of power on your part as the interviewer. I only hope I don't show my Jr. DBAs that kind of arrogance.



Vladan
Vladan
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 5580 Visits: 761

Abuse of power? Make the individual feel lesser of an individual because of his knowledge base? Served no useful purpose?

These are some of the opinions about e-mail sent to the interviewee that I definitely don't agree with. While there is little doubt about the fact that it was neither tactful nor politically correct, it could have served a useful purpose : It said precisely what is the reason for refusing the candidate. I hate those answers that are polite and say nothing ("we found a better candidate") and I would prefer to receive an e-mail like this one. I would not feel "lesser of an individual" because of it, IMHO precisely these prefabricated politically correct answers are what can one make feel like a wheel in a machinery. This answer was personal, individually written, and for me it would be a proof of the fact that they really considered my performance and found it bad.

True, a few of the formulations used were more personal and more harsh than necessary, but nobody is perfect. People should be able to hear the true opinion of other about themselves and take it. They can disagree with it, they can think that the interviewer was wrong, but they can learn a lot from it - either that they don't know enough, or that they have problems explaining things they in fact know, or that this position was entirely different from what they are looking for... or even that they wouldn't like to work under such boss anyway. Much, much better than simple "access denied" error message you get so often

Thanks for sharing your experience!





Anipaul
Anipaul
SSCrazy Eights
SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (9.9K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 9927 Visits: 1407
80% of people inflates their resume. May everyone % of inflate in not same but they do.........Smile



jack-64275
jack-64275
SSC-Addicted
SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 461 Visits: 559
Sounds like a REALLY poor interview... on both sides. If I had an interview with someone that had Sean's personality I would have walked out too. Not the kind of person I would ever work for / with/



GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)SSC Guru (234K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 234540 Visits: 46373
Please note: 6 year old thread.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


jack-64275
jack-64275
SSC-Addicted
SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)SSC-Addicted (461 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 461 Visits: 559
Point?



Ninja's_RGR'us
Ninja's_RGR'us
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)SSC Guru (70K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 70085 Visits: 9671
GilaMonster (4/30/2011)
Please note: 6 year old thread.



I wonder why it bothers you that people "activate" old threads?
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search