SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Like operator - Query performance issue


Like operator - Query performance issue

Author
Message
Krishna1
Krishna1
Right there with Babe
Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 780 Visits: 556
Dear All

Have a table with 15 million rows. And Almost 15 columns. I am using following query. which is very slow. This table is having cluster index

select top 100
from TABLE
where COLUMN1 like '%xxx%'
OR Column2 like '%xxx%'
.
.
.
OR Column12 like '%xxx%'

Is there a better way to get the same result.
twin.devil
twin.devil
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 5116 Visits: 2692
The % at the start means your search needs to read every row and look for a match. If you really need that kind of search you should look into using a full text index.



There is also a bug related with LIKE Statement. you can look to that as well.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2847467

Hope it helps.
gstarsaini
gstarsaini
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (508 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 508 Visits: 182
Partitions would be helpful.Then you could also restrict conditions in where clause
Krishna1
Krishna1
Right there with Babe
Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 780 Visits: 556
create full text index fro all the 15 columns?
Krishna1
Krishna1
Right there with Babe
Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)Right there with Babe (780 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 780 Visits: 556
sorry did not understand about partitionong
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)SSC Guru (212K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 212755 Visits: 46259
Partitioning is unlikely to help at all.

Unless you can add some SARGable predicates (predicates where SQL can use indexes to reduce the rows it has to read), there's probably not much that can be done. LIKE with a leading wildcard requires SQL to read every row, so that query will read every row of the table.

Full text may or may not help. Try it out and see.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


Grant Fritchey
Grant Fritchey
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)SSC Guru (94K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 94139 Visits: 33010
Partitioning is not primarily a performance tuning mechanism. It is primarily a data management mechanism. There are cases where you can get performance improvements, but you need to remember that it's not designed to do that. It's designed to help with large scale data management.

----------------------------------------------------
The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood...
Theodore Roosevelt

The Scary DBA
Author of: SQL Server Query Performance Tuning and SQL Server Execution Plans
Product Evangelist for Red Gate Software
ChrisM@Work
ChrisM@Work
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (39K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 39474 Visits: 19991
As an aside, it seems odd that you are searching so many of those columns. Can you show us what the data looks like?

“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
Exploring Recursive CTEs by Example Dwain Camps
Jeff Moden
Jeff Moden
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)SSC Guru (204K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 204737 Visits: 41952
gsaini 95591 (3/31/2014)
Partitions would be helpful.Then you could also restrict conditions in where clause


We're talking about a leading wildcard in 12 different columns. As the others have suggested, parititioning wouldn't help that at all.

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.
If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to post performance problems
Forum FAQs
Eirikur Eiriksson
Eirikur Eiriksson
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (38K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 38664 Visits: 19425
Krishna1 (3/31/2014)
create full text index fro all the 15 columns?

Sounds like a good option, have used this in similar situations before with good results.
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search