Home Forums SQL Server 2005 SQL Server 2005 Performance Tuning Table Valued functions Vs Scalar Valued Functions RE: Table Valued functions Vs Scalar Valued Functions

  • June 28, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    #835794

    about 300-million rows

    That's kinda what I thought you were going to say.

    What I was suggesting is that the distance from Point A to Point B is exactly the same as the distance from Point B to Point A... wouldn't that cut your row count about in half if you did it like half a multiplication table for each "group"?

    --Jeff Moden

    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)