Greg Young (2/13/2008)
Doesn't anybody proof these questions? This is yet another example of where you have to guess what limitations the author had in mind. I tend to write UDFs that use column inputs (don't know why, just seems to work that way) so they always have to be evaluated on every row. If you don't specify the assumptions then no answer is truly correct and we're just throwing darts.
Totally agree! I think at least a couple of people have to proof read every question. These kind of questions takes the fun out of it :/
If anyone is listening, I would volunteer if there was such a 'proof reading' group and I hope a lot of other people would do the same.
Regards,
Hanslindgren
EDIT: Of course I do not say that the questions will be perfect after 'proofing' them, just that it has a probability of becoming slightly better 😀