GilaMonster - Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:21 AM
Ah... ok. So it uses the same method as doing a code search. Wouldn't it just be easier to review the code so that you don't have to filter through all of the duplication that such a method will generate? Also, that will only capture the code that's currently being used. It may not capture code that's not frequently used.
And, yeah... I agree... no matter what, a secondary filter is absolutely necessary. Hopefully such a filter isn't the same human that wrote the code to begin with.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.