ChrisM@Work (1/29/2014)
Jeff Moden (1/29/2014)
Post deleted. I made a mistake. I'll be back.A little history Jeff. Might save you some time.
You're right. That's insane and now I know what you meant in your original post. The OP changes perfectly good data to denormalized data and then tries to do a search on the denormalized data. I just don't get that and your original suggestion on this post is correct.
Too bad because I finally learned how to copy'n'paste my SARGable solution correctly. :blush:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.